As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2014.

 

Registration Statement No. 333-_______

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

 

AMP HOLDING INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Nevada   3711   26-1394771
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

 

100 Commerce Drive

Loveland, Ohio 45140

513-360-4704

(Address and telephone number of registrant’s principal executive offices)

 

Stephen S. Burns

Chief Executive Officer

AMP Holding Inc.

100 Commerce Drive

Loveland, Ohio 45140

513-360-4704

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

 

 

 Copies to:

 

Stephen M. Fleming

Fleming PLLC

49 Front Street, Suite 206

Rockville Centre, New York 11570

516-833-5034

Ralph V. De Martino

Cavas S. Pavri

Schiff Hardin LLP

901 K Street NW, Suite 700
Washington, DC 20001

202-778-6400

 

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this registration statement.

 

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the following box:   ☐

 

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.   ☐

  

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.   ☐

 

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.   ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer  ☐   Accelerated filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☐  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller reporting company ☒

 

The registrant is an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act. This registration statement complies with the requirements that apply to an issuer that is an emerging growth company.

 

 
 

 

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

 

Title of Each Class of Securities to be
Registered
  Amount to be Registered   Proposed
Maximum Offering
Price
Per Share
   Proposed
Maximum
Aggregate
Offering
Price (1)
   Amount of
Registration
Fee (2)
 
Units consisting of Common Stock and Series A Warrants                    
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, underlying the Units (5)   66,666,667 shares   $0.15   $10,000,000   $1,162.00 
Series A Warrants consisting of one half share of Common Stock, underlying the Units  (3)   33,333,333 warrants    (3)   (3)   - 
Common Stock underlying the Series A Warrants (5)   33,333,333 shares   $0.15   $5,000,000   $581.00 
Representative’s Unit Purchase Option (3)        (3)   (3)   - 
Common Stock underlying Units included in the Unit Purchase Option (4)   4,666,667 shares   $0.15   $700,000   $81.34 
Series A Warrants underlying Units included in the Unit Purchase Option   2,333,334 warrants    (3)   (3)   -- 
Common Stock underlying Series A Warrants included in the Units included in the Unit Purchase Option   2,333,334 shares   $0.15   $350,000   $40.67 
Total Registration Fee   -    -   $16,050,000   $1,865.01 

  

(1)

Estimated solely for the purpose of computing the amount of the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Includes offering price of securities that the underwriters have the option to purchase to cover over-allotments, if any.

 

(2)

Calculated pursuant to Rule 457(o) based on an estimate of the proposed maximum aggregate offering price of the securities registered hereunder to be sold by the registrant.

 

(3)

No registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(g) under the Securities Act.

 

(4) Estimated solely for the purposes of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(g) under the Securities Act. The Representative’s Warrants are exercisable at a per share exercise price equal to 100% of the public offering price. As estimated solely for the purpose of recalculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(g) under the Securities Act, the proposed maximum aggregate offering price of the Representative’s Warrant is $700,000 (7% of $10,000,000).

 

The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

 

 

 

 
 

 

The information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and we are not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

 

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS SUBJECT TO COMPLETION DATED         , 2014

  

 

 

Units

Each Unit Consisting of One Share of Common Stock and

One-Half (0.5) of a Series A Warrant to Purchase One-Half (0.5) of a Share of Common Stock

 

This is a firm commitment initial public offering of the securities of AMP Holding Inc. We are offering          shares of common stock and          Series A Warrants. Each whole Series A Warrant is exercisable for one share of common stock. We expect that the initial public offering price for one unit consisting of one share and one-half (0.5) Series A Warrant will be between $         and $        . Although issued together, the shares of common stock and Series A Warrants may be transferred separately immediately upon issuance.

 

Each whole Series A Warrant is exercisable for one share of common stock. A whole Series A Warrants is immediately exercisable upon issuance in this initial public offering at an initial exercise price of 100% of the initial public offering price of one unit in this offering. The Series A Warrants will expire on the fifth anniversary of the date of issuance. The shares of common stock issuable from time to time upon the exercise of the Series A Warrants are also being offered pursuant to this prospectus.

 

Our common stock is currently traded on the OTC Markets (OTCQB) under the symbol “AMPD”. On December 10, 2014, the last reported sales price of our common stock was $0.15 per share. We intend to change our name to Workhorse Advanced Vehicles Inc. and apply to list our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market (Nasdaq) under the symbol “WAV”. The Series A Warrants will not be listed for trading on a securities exchange.

 

Before investing in our common stock and warrants exercisable for common stock, you should carefully read the discussion of “Risk Factors” beginning on page 7. Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 

      Per
Unit
      Total  
Public offering price (1)   $       $    
Underwriting discounts and commissions (2)   $       $    
Offering proceeds to us, before expenses   $       $    

 

 

(1) The price per unit of $______ includes $0.005 for each warrant to purchase 0.5 shares of common stock included in such unit.

 

(2) Does not include a non-accountable expense allowance equal to 1% of the gross proceeds of this offering payable to Dawson James Securities, Inc., the representative of the underwriters, or the issuance of a unit purchase option to acquire 7% of the units sold in this offering. See “Underwriting.”

 

We have also granted a 45-day option to the representative of the underwriters to purchase up to (i)              additional shares of common stock, and (ii) additional Series A Warrants to purchase up to              additional shares of common stock solely to cover over-allotments, if any. The over-allotment option may be used to purchase shares of common stock and Series A Warrants, as determined by the underwriters, but such purchases cannot exceed an aggregate of 15% of the number of shares of common stock and Series A Warrants sold in the primary offering.

 

The underwriters expect to deliver our securities to purchasers in the offering on or about             , 2015.

 

Sole Book Running Manager

 

Dawson James Securities, Inc.

 

 
 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

    Page  
Prospectus Summary     1  
The Offering     4  
Summary Financial Data     6  
Risk Factors     7  
Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements     18  
Use of Proceeds     19  
Dividend Policy     20  
Capitalization     21  
Dilution     22  
Selected Financial Data     24  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations     26  
Business     42  
Management     80  
Executive and Director Compensation     46  
Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions     48  
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management     50  
Description of Certain Indebtedness     51  
Description of Capital Stock     52  
Shares Eligible for Future Sale     54  
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations to U.S. Holders     56  
Underwriting     59  
Legal Matters     63  
Experts     63  
Where you Can Find More Information     63  
Index to Financial Statements     F-1  

 

We have not authorized anyone to provide any information or to make any representations other than those contained in this prospectus or in any free writing prospectus prepared by or on behalf of us or to which we have referred you. We take no responsibility for, and can provide no assurance as to the reliability of, any other information that others may give to you. The information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or any sale of our common stock.

 

AMP’s logo and some of our trademarks, including the Workhorse ® are used in this prospectus. This prospectus also includes trademarks, trade names, and service marks that are the property of other organizations. Solely for convenience, our trademarks and trade names referred to in this prospectus appear without the ™ or the ® symbol, but those references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights, or the right of the applicable licensor to these trademarks and trade names.

 

This prospectus contains estimates, projections and other information concerning our industry, our business and the potential markets for our platform, including data regarding the estimated demand in those markets, their projected growth rates, as well as data regarding market research, estimates and forecasts prepared by our management. Information that is based on estimates, forecasts, projections, market research or similar methodologies is inherently subject to uncertainties and actual events or circumstances may differ materially from events and circumstances that are assumed in this information. Unless otherwise expressly stated, we obtained this industry, business, market and other data from reports, research surveys, studies and similar data prepared by market research firms and other third parties, industry, medical and general publications, government data and similar sources. While we believe these industry publications and third-party research, surveys and studies are reliable, we have not independently verified such data. In some cases, we do not expressly refer to the sources from which this data is derived. In that regard, when we refer to one or more sources of this type of data in any paragraph, you should assume that other data of this type appearing in the same paragraph is derived from the same sources, unless otherwise expressly stated or the context otherwise requires.

 

Unless the context requires otherwise references to “AMP Holding Inc.” “AMP Holding”, “Workhorse”, our “company,” “we,” “us” or “our” refer to AMP Holding Inc., a Nevada corporation, doing business as AMP Holding. We intend to change our name to Workhorse Advanced Vehicles Inc. AMP Holding primarily manages its operations through its two wholly owned subsidiaries, AMP Trucks Inc. (“AMP Trucks”), an Indiana corporation, and AMP Electric Vehicles Inc., an Ohio corporation (“AMP”).

 

i
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Note Regarding Reverse Stock Split

 

As of                  2014, our Board intends to approve an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation to effect a reverse split of our common stock that we refer to as the Reverse Stock Split. Under NRS 78.207, the Board of Directors has the authority to reverse split the outstanding and authorized shares of common stock at an identical ratio solely based on the approval of the Board of Directors and without shareholder approval. Our Board is contemplating a Reverse Stock Split, at any time on or before                  with the final ratio to be determined at the discretion of our Board. Unless we indicate otherwise, the information in this prospectus does not reflect the pro forma impact of the Reverse Stock Split.

  

ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

 

The following information is a summary of the prospectus and it does not contain all of the information you should consider before investing in our securities. You should read the entire prospectus carefully, including the “Risk Factors” section and our financial statements and the notes relating to the financial statements, before making an investment decision.

 

Our Company

 

Overview

 

AMP Holding Inc., which is in the process of changing its name to Workhorse Advanced Vehicles Inc., designs and produces high-performance electric vehicles (EVs) specifically engineered to enable our fleet customers to deliver goods and services with minimal environmental impact while reducing costs by 50% as compared to standard gas powered vehicles. Our new vehicles will be assembled at our 270,000 sq. ft. Indiana facility, which has a capacity to produce up to 60,000 complete chassis per year. Our medium duty vehicles come in two models: the Workhorse E-100 all-electric truck and the E-GEN™ electric truck with on board charging. Over the life of the vehicle, the Workhorse E-GEN™ potentially offers a savings of $100,000, with the savings beginning immediately as compared to standard gas delivery vehicles, and a positive return on investment (ROI) by year three based on current gasoline and electricity costs. We believe these electric trucks represent the future of logistics by creating both economic and environmental benefits.

 

Customers

 

On June 16, 2014 we received an initial order for two E-GEN vehicles from a major transportation company that operates one of the world’s largest fleets of delivery vehicles. The vehicles will be deployed by February 2015. This initial order was followed by a larger purchase agreement that Workhorse has entered into with this company to supply a total of 18 Workhorse E-100 all-electric walk in vans to be deployed in the Houston-Galveston-Brazonia, Texas area. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Energy Technology Laboratory awarded a grant to accelerate the introduction of electric vehicles to improve local air quality in the Houston-Galveston-Brazonia area, which is currently designated as a National Ambient Air Quality Non-Attainment Area.

 

Government Incentives

 

Our trucks qualify for financial incentives to lower the purchase price of an EV truck in states and cities including New York, California, and Chicago. Without these current incentives, our logistics solutions still offer a 50 % cost advantage as compared to traditional gas vehicles.

 

Market Size & Distribution Channels

 

In the market for electric logistics vehicles, we directly address the step van/strip chassis market. The market segments our vehicles serve include package and product delivery companies, uniform and laundry services, food services, utilities, and special-use industries. Companies operating in the space that are potential customers for AMP include UPS, FedEx, Bimbo Bakeries, Aramark, Canada Post, Cintas, Purolator, Peapod, UniFirst, and Frito Lay. We have sold our initial vehicles through our internal sales force but have the ability to sell our Workhorse vehicles through a distribution channel of approximately 440 dealers nationwide.

 

Vehicles

 

In addition to building its own chassis, AMP designs and produces two, second-generation, battery-electric drive trains both powered by Panasonic 18650 Li Ion cells. AMP’s E-100 V.2 all electric drive train features a 100 kWh battery pack offering a range of up to 100 miles. AMP’s E-GEN, introduced in 2014, is its newest drive train employing a 2200 nm permanent magnet electric drive motor coupled to a small internal combustion engine (ICE) that drives the electric motor in generator mode to keep the battery pack within the desired level of charge.

 

Market Entry

 

Based on market experience, we believe that the duty cycle of the average medium-duty local delivery truck market represents the appropriate entry point to launch electric trucks due to the quick financial payback associated with electrification. To our knowledge, our Workhorse E-GEN™ electric truck, which has an EPA approved on-board internal combustion engine, provides a three-year payback without any government financial incentives. Over the typical 10-year life of a medium-duty delivery truck, our Workhorse E-GEN electric truck is designed to save its owner over $100,000 in fuel and maintenance savings, a projected 75% reduction in costs compared to gas powered vehicles based on current fuel and electricity costs.

 

 

1
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

Our Workhorse E-GEN electric truck is the first of its kind. Purpose-built for the package delivery vehicle market, it is expected to offer three-times the miles per gallon than typical gasoline-powered vans in use today. The E-GEN power train is unique in that it employs a 2200 nm permanent magnet motor/generator for propulsion plus a 2.4 Liter internal combustion engine that turns the electric motor in generator mode to recharge the battery pack under certain conditions i.e. the battery pack falls below a predetermined level, the vehicle is in park with the key out, and the emergency brake is on. As such, it can be charging while the driver stops the vehicle to make a delivery or pauses for lunch.

 

We believe the E-GEN will change the economics of EV acquisition by reducing battery costs, which in the past has been an impediment to the mass adoption of commercial EVs. By integrating Panasonic 18650 batteries with our proprietary battery management system, control software, charging innovations, and mechanical packaging, we are able to keep total vehicle cost at an attractive price point. At the same time, AMP is continually assessing battery technology and applications.

 

HorseFly™

 

Our unique HorseFly line of drones is designed to be the ‘last mile’ solution in delivery logistics. We worked with the University of Cincinnati to develop the HorseFly to meet the rigors of package delivery and to have eight rotors and redundant systems to ensure safety in the air. Today, we estimate that it costs approximately $1 to move a 20,000-pound diesel-powered truck one mile.  While we believe our Workhorse trucks can reduce the standard delivery costs from $1 to less than $0.30 cents per mile based on current costs of fuel, We expect that having drones handle the last leg of delivery could further potentially reduce the cost to about $.03 cents for the last mile. The all weather HorseFly battery-powered drone will carry up to 10 pounds of cargo with a 15-mile range. It is designed to meet the anticipated FAA drone guidelines expected in 2015, of which there is no guarantee, and is differentiated from other drones as it is designed to work in tandem with a Workhorse electric truck. HorseFly will deliver packages, loaded on-route by the truck's driver, to remote locations while the driver continues on the main delivery route. HorseFly will then rejoin the truck at its new location after its delivery is completed, saving the fleet operator much of the time and fuel cost of the last, most expensive, mile. Also while the HorseFly is atop the Workhorse truck, it can quickly charge its batteries from the truck's large battery pack.  We believe this implementation is superior to the proposed deployment of other delivery drones wherein the package is loaded at a distant warehouse and the drone must make a round trip flight to the delivery address and back to the warehouse.  Other applications for the HorseFly include transmission line inspections and agricultural surveys.

 

Facilities

 

In March of 2013, we purchased the former Workhorse Custom Chassis assembly plant in Union City, Indiana from a subsidiary of Navistar International with the goal of transforming the company into the leading producer of electric medium duty trucks in the United States. To our knowledge, Workhorse Advanced Vehicles is the only commercial electric vehicle OEM in the country.

 

With the purchase we acquired a 220,000 sq. ft. factory, a 50,000 sq. ft. engineering facility, all the intellectual property and patents, and access to the 440 Workhorse dealers across the U.S., and established a supply agreement with its parts supplier UpTime parts. The mechanical, electrical and software design and engineering is done at our Cincinnati, Ohio headquarters. Ownership of this plant enables us to build new chassis with gross vehicle weight capacities of between 10,000 and 26,000 pounds and offer them with four different fuel variants—electric, gas, propane (LPG) and compressed natural gas (CNG).

 

Intellectual Property

 

We have six issued patents and two pending in the U.S. We also plan to pursue appropriate foreign patent protection. AMP also has five pending trademark applications and two issued trademark registrations in the U.S. with intent to pursue foreign trademark registration as well.

 

Competitive Landscape

 

We believe our ability to meet fleet performance specifications and reduce vehicle lifecycle costs affords us significant advantages over competing EVs. Other companies currently competing in the EV fleet logistics market include Ford Motor Company, Freightliner, Smith Electric Vehicles, and Electric Vehicles International. Batteries are the most expensive part of an EV. Workhorse uses Panasonic LI batteries; therefore our E-GEN battery packs are under $20,000 since they can be recharged from the ICE, as compared to the industry’s average battery pack cost of $72,000. Competing EV trucks have limited range because they are electric only. Our EPA-approved E-GEN emergency range electric, medium-duty truck offers greater range since the truck can recharge when parked. As an OEM, our manufacturing costs are lower as compared to competitors that are installing their drive trains into chassis from another manufacturer.

 

 

2
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

Management Team

 

Our executive team has deep experience in the automotive industry, engineering field, and public company management. Our Chairman has 34 years of automotive and engineering management experience and was CEO of Hummer and General Manager of Cadillac. Our Founder and CEO is a veteran entrepreneur who has founded several successful start-ups, while our CFO has 35 years of financial management experience at several public companies. Our engineering executives are from Navistar, Autocar LLC, Procter and Gamble, and the United States Naval Research Lab.

 

Convertible Note Offering

 

From November 2014 through December 2014, we entered into Subscription Agreements with several accredited investors (the “2014 Investors”) providing for the sale by us to the 2014 Investors of 14% Unsecured Convertible Promissory Notes in the aggregate amount of $900,000 (the "2014 Notes").  In addition to the 2014 Notes, the 2014 Investors also received common stock purchase warrants (the “2014 Warrants”) to acquire 3,214,286 shares of common stock. The 2014 Warrants are exercisable for five years at an exercise price of $0.14.  Dawson James acted as placement agent.

 

The 2014 Notes mature one year from their respective effective dates (the "Maturity Dates") and interest associated with the 2014 Notes is 14% per annum, which is payable on the Maturity Dates.  The 2014 Notes are convertible into shares of common stock of the Company, at the 2014 Investors’ option, at a conversion price of $0.14. However, the 2014 Notes convert automatically upon our increasing our authorized shares of common stock to 500,000,000 shares of common stock or such other amount that would allow for the full conversion of the 2014 Notes.  The 2014 Notes and the 2014 Warrants carry standard anti-dilution provisions and price protection provisions for a period of six months.

 

Our Corporate Information

 

We are a Nevada corporation headquartered in Loveland, Ohio that does business as AMP Holding Inc. utilizing the Workhorse ® brand. Our manufacturing facility is located in Union City, Indiana. We were originally incorporated as Title Starts Online Inc. on November 13, 2007. On December 28, 2009, we entered into and closed a Share Exchange Agreement with the shareholders of AMP Electric Vehicles, Inc. pursuant to which we acquired 100% of the outstanding securities of AMP in exchange for 14,890,904 shares of our common stock.  We formally changed our name to AMP Holding Inc. on May 24, 2010. On March 4, 2013, AMP Trucks Inc. (“AMP Trucks”), an Indiana corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of AMP Holding, entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Workhorse Custom Chassis, LLC (“Workhorse”), an Illinois limited liability company and a wholly-owned affiliate of Navistar International Corporation, to purchase certain assets including the Workhorse ® brand, logo, intellectual property, patents and approximately 250,000 sq. ft. of facilities on 48 acres of land in Union City, Indiana (the “Workhorse Assets”). On March 13, 2013, AMP Trucks closed the acquisition of the Assets from Workhorse for a purchase price of $5,000,000 of which $2,750,000 was paid in cash and the delivery of a Secured Debenture (the “Workhorse Debenture”) in the principal amount of $2,250,000.  The Workhorse Debenture is secured pursuant to a Security Agreement (the “Workhorse Security Agreement”) and a Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignment of Rents and Fixture Filing (the “Workhorse Mortgage”) entered between AMP Trucks and Workhorse.  Pursuant to the Security Agreement, AMP Trucks granted Workhorse a security interest in all of the assets of AMP Trucks in order to secure the prompt payment, performance and discharge in full of all of obligations of AMP Trucks under the Workhorse Debenture.  Pursuant to the Workhorse Mortgage, the Workhorse Debenture is secured by the real estate and related assets of the plant located in Union City, Indiana.  The Workhorse Debenture matures three years from its effective date of March 13, 2013 (the " Workhorse Maturity Date") and interest associated with the Debenture is 10% per annum, which is payable on the Maturity Date.  AMP Trucks may prepay outstanding principal and interest of the Workhorse Debenture in full at any time.  In the event AMP Trucks prepays outstanding principal and interest, it shall pay an amount equal to all outstanding principal and interest multiplied by 105%.   AMP Holding and AMP guaranteed the payment of the Workhorse Debenture.

 

Our fiscal year ends December 31 of each year. Our principal executive offices are located at 100 Commerce Drive, Loveland, Ohio 45140. Our telephone number is 513-360-4704. Our website address is www.ampelectricvehicles.com. The information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not incorporated by reference in this prospectus and should not be considered a part of this prospectus. We have included our website address in this prospectus solely as an inactive textual reference.

 

 

3
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

THE OFFERING

  

Securities we are offering  

        units, with each unit consisting of one share of common stock and one-half (0.5) Series A Warrant to purchase one-half (0.5) share of common stock. The units will not be certificated and the shares of common stock and Series A Warrants may be transferred separately immediately upon issuance.

 

Each Series A Warrant is exercisable for one-half share of common stock. A whole Series A Warrants is immediately exercisable upon issuance in this initial public offering at an initial exercise price of 100% of the initial public offering price of one unit in this offering. The Series A Warrants will expire on the fifth anniversary of the date of issuance.

  

The shares of common stock issuable from time to time upon the exercise of the Series A Warrants are also being offered pursuant to this prospectus.

   
Public offering price   $         (the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus) per unit.
   
Common stock outstanding before this offering   149,667,926 shares
     

Common stock included in the securities we are offering

 

(i)         shares, which assumes no exercise of the Series A Warrants; or (ii)         shares, which assumes the full exercise of the Series A Warrants.

   
Common stock to be outstanding immediately after this offering           shares, which assumes no exercise of the Series A Warrants.
     
Over-allotment option   We have granted a 45-day option to the representative of the underwriters to purchase up to (i)         additional shares of common stock, and (ii)         additional Series A Warrants, solely to cover over-allotments, if any. Such purchases cannot exceed an aggregate of 15% of the number of shares and Series A Warrants sold in the primary offering.
   
Use of proceeds   We estimate that the net proceeds from this offering will be approximately $       million, or approximately $         million if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, at an assumed initial public offering price of $         per unit, (the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus), after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering as follows: (i) approximately $         million for developing our sales and service organization, (ii) approximately $      million for research and development, (iii) approximately $         million to finance capital expenditures, and (iv) the remaining proceeds, if any, will be used for general corporate purposes, including working capital. See “Use of Proceeds” for a more complete description of the intended use of proceeds from this offering.
   
Risk Factors   Investing in our securities involves substantial risks. You should read the “Risk Factors” section starting on page for a discussion of factors to consider carefully before deciding to invest in our securities.
   
Symbol   Our common stock is currently traded on the OTC Markets (OTCQB) under the symbol “AMPD”.  On December 10, 2014, the last reported sales price of our common stock was $0.15 per share.  We intend to change our name to Workhorse Advanced Vehicles Inc. and apply to list our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market (Nasdaq) under the symbol “WAV”.  The Series A Warrants will not be listed for trading on a securities exchange.

 

 

4
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

The number of shares of our common stock outstanding before and after this offering, as set forth in the table above, is based on 149,667,926 shares outstanding as of November 20, 2014 and excludes as of that date:

 

  up to         shares of common stock issuable upon the full exercise of the Series A Warrants offered hereby;
     
  53,417,613 shares of common stock issuable upon the full exercise of warrants to purchase shares of common stock;
     
  23,560,565 Options to purchase shares of our common stock issued under our 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan.
     
  5,104,750 shares of our common stock reserved for future issuance under our 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, 2012 Stock Incentive Plan,  the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan;
     
  6,428,571 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the 14% unsecured convertible notes issued in November 2014 through December 2014;
     
          shares of our common stock underlying the warrants to be issued to the representative of the underwriters in connection with this offering, plus up to         shares of our common stock if the over-allotment option to purchase shares of common stock is exercised in full; and
     
  the pro forma impact of the proposed Reverse Stock Split.

 

Unless otherwise indicated, all information in this prospectus:

 

  assumes no exercise of the representative’s warrants described above;
     
  assumes no exercise of any outstanding options or warrants to purchase common stock;
     
  assumes no exercise by the representative of the underwriters of its option to purchase up to    units consisting of (i)         additional shares of common stock, and (ii)         additional Series A Warrants to cover over-allotments, if any;
     
  does not reflect the pro forma impact of the proposed Reverse Stock Split.
     

  

5
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA

 

The summary financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes, “Selected Financial Data” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

We derived the statement of operations data for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 from our audited financial statements appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. We derived the statement of operations data for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2014 and balance sheet data as of September 30, 2014 from our unaudited financial statements appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

   Years Ended
December 31,
   Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
   2012   2013   2013   2014 
                 
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:                    
Sales  $272,098   $177,500   $177,500   $177,459 
                     
Operating Expenses                    
Selling, general and administrative   2,329,398    3,137,288    2,504,110    2,521,695 
Research and development   1,984,302    2,892,505    2,285,637    2,364,686 
Total operating expenses   4,313,700    6,029,793    4,789,746    4,886,381 
                     
Interest expense, net   230,887    258,261    179,029    92,218 
                     
  Net loss during the development stage  $(4,272,489)  $(6,110,554)  $(4,791,275)  $(4,801,140)
                     
Basic and diluted loss per share  $(0.10)  $(0.08)  $(0.07)  $(0.03)
                     
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding 44,915,220 75,710,613 73,164,046 149,057,350

  

   As of December 31,   As of September 30, 2014 
   2012   2013   Actual   Pro Forma   Pro Forma as Adjusted (1) 
               (Unaudited) 
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:                         
Cash and cash equivalents   39,819    7,019    833,834           
Property plant and equipment, net   126,847    4,407,261    4,112,685           
Working capital   (2,344,694)   (4,020,842)   (462,847)          
Total assets   220,693    4,850,997    5,410,234           
Long term debt, less current portion   362,186    2,292,890    2,495,244           
Common stock   55,955    82,712    149,051           
Additional paid in capital   14,956,547    20,321,536    26,992,044           
Stock based compensation   3,778,723    5,171,093    6,456,211           
Total stockholders' deficit   (21,371,258)   (27,481,812)   (32,442,712)        

 

(1) The pro forma as adjusted balance sheet data above reflects the issuance of         shares of our common stock upon the completion of this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $             per share (the mid-point of the price range on the front cover of this prospectus) after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

 

 

6
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

RISK FACTORS

 

An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. Before you invest in our securities, you should give careful consideration to the following risk factors, in addition to the other information included in this prospectus, including our financial statements and related notes, before deciding whether to invest in our securities. The occurrence of any of the adverse developments described in the following risk factors could materially and adversely harm our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

 

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

 

Our results of operations have not resulted in profitability and we may not be able to achieve profitability going forward.

  

We have incurred net losses amounting to $32.4 million for the period from inception (February 20, 2007) through September 30, 2014.  In addition, as of September 30, 2014, we had a working capital deficiency of $462,000.  We have had net losses in each quarter since our inception. We expect that we will continue to incur net losses for the foreseeable future. We may incur significant losses in the future for a number of reasons, including the other risks described in this prospectus, and we may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other unknown events. Accordingly, we may not be able to achieve or maintain profitability. Our management is developing plans to alleviate the negative trends and conditions described above and there is no guarantee that such plans will be successfully implemented.  Our business plan has changed from concentrating on the electric passenger vehicle market to the electric medium duty trucks, but is still unproven.  There is no assurance that even if we successfully implement our business plan, that we will be able to curtail our losses.  Further, as we are a development stage enterprise, we expect that net losses and the working capital deficiency will continue. If we incur additional significant operating losses, our stock price may decline, perhaps significantly.

 

We have yet to achieve positive cash flow and, given our projected funding needs, our ability to generate positive cash flow is uncertain.

 

We have had negative cash flow from operating activities of $2.7 million and $2.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and $2.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. We anticipate that we will continue to have negative cash flow from operating and investing activities for the foreseeable future as we expect to incur increased research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative expenses and make significant capital expenditures in our efforts to increase sales and commence operations at our Union City facility. Our business also will at times require significant amounts of working capital to support our growth, particularly as we acquire inventory to support our anticipated increase in production. An inability to generate positive cash flow for the foreseeable future may adversely affect our ability to raise needed capital for our business on reasonable terms, diminish supplier or customer willingness to enter into transactions with us, and have other adverse effects that may decrease our long-term viability. There can be no assurance we will achieve positive cash flow in the foreseeable future.

 

We may need access to additional financing, which may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. For the year ended December 31, 2013, our independent registered public accounting firm issued a report on our 2013 financial statements that contains an explanatory paragraph stating that the lack of sales, negative working capital and stockholders’ deficit, raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. If we cannot access additional financing when we need it and on acceptable terms, our business, prospects, financial condition, operating results and ability to continue as a going concern could be adversely affected.

 

Our growth-oriented business plan to design, produce, sell and service commercial electric vehicles through our Union City facility will require continued capital investment. Our research and development activities will require continued investment. For the year ended December 31, 2013, our independent registered public accounting firm issued a report on our 2013 financial statements that contains an explanatory paragraph stating that the lack of sales, negative working capital and stockholders’ deficit, raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Assuming this offering does not close, we expect that our cash and cash equivalent balances, will be sufficient to fund our operating activities through January 31, 2015, which will not allow us to implement our business plan in any meaningful way. Based on an operating plan that assumes we receive net proceeds from this offering, we expect that our cash and cash equivalent balances and our anticipated cash from operating activities, will be sufficient to fund our operating activities, including the implementation of our business plan through 2016. However, if our operating costs exceed our expectations or if we incur any significant unplanned expenses, we may need to raise additional funds through the issuance of equity, equity-related or debt securities or by obtaining credit from government or financial institutions. This capital will be necessary to fund our ongoing operations, continue research, development and design efforts, open our sales, service and assembly facilities, improve infrastructure and introduce new or improve existing vehicle models. We cannot be certain that additional financing will be available to us on favorable terms when required, or at all, particularly given that we do not now have a committed credit facility with any government or financial institution. If we cannot obtain additional financing when we need it and on terms acceptable to us, our business, prospects, financial condition, operating results and ability to continue as a going concern could be adversely affected.

 

7
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Our limited operating history makes it difficult for us to evaluate our future business prospects and make decisions based on those estimates of our future performance.

 

We have basically been a research and development company since beginning operations in February 2007.  We have a limited operating history and have generated limited revenue.  As we move more toward a manufacturing environment it is difficult, if not impossible, to forecast our future results based upon our historical data.  Because of the uncertainties related to our lack of historical operations, we may be hindered in our ability to anticipate and timely adapt to increases or decreases in revenues or expenses.  If we make poor budgetary decisions as a result of unreliable historical data, we could be less profitable or incur losses, which may result in a decline in our stock price.

 

Failure to successfully integrate the Workhorse ® brand, logo, intellectual property, patents and assembly plant in Union City, Indiana into our operations could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

 

As part of our strategy to become an OEM, in March 2013, we acquired Workhorse and the Workhorse Assets including the Workhorse ® brand, logo, intellectual property, patents and assembly plant in Union City, Indiana.  The Workhorse acquisition may expose us to operational challenges and risks, including the diversion of management’s attention from our existing business, the failure to retain key Workhorse dealers and our ability to commence operations at the plant in Union City, Indiana.  Our ability to sustain our growth and maintain our competitive position may be affected by our ability to successfully integrate the Workhorse Assets.

 

Our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results will be adversely affected if we cannot reduce and adequately control the costs and expenses associated with operating our business, including our material and production costs.

 

We incur significant costs and expenses related to procuring the materials, components and services required to develop and produce our electric vehicles. We have secured supply agreements for our critical components including our batteries. However, these are dependent on volume to ensure that they are available at a competitive price.   As a result, our current cost projections are considerably higher than the projected revenue stream that such vehicles will produce.  As a result we are continually working on initiatives to reduce our cost structure so that we may effectively compete. If we do not properly manage our costs and expenses our net losses will continue which will negatively impact our stock price.

 

If we are unable to pay off the outstanding amount owed under the debenture in the principal amount of $2,250,000 that is secured against all of the assets of AMP Trucks including the Workhorse brand and the Union City facility and such lien holder were to take possession of such assets, our operations would be severely negatively impacted if not curtailed.

 

On March 4, 2013, AMP Trucks entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Workhorse Custom Chassis, LLC (“WCC”), an Illinois limited liability company and a wholly-owned affiliate of Navistar International Corporation, to purchase certain assets including the Workhorse ® brand, logo, intellectual property, patents and approximately 250,000 sq. ft. of facilities on 48 acres of land in Union City, Indiana (the “Assets”). On March 13, 2013, AMP Trucks closed the acquisition of the Assets from WCC for a purchase price of $5,000,000 of which $2,750,000 was paid in cash and the delivery of a Secured Debenture (the “Debenture”) in the principal amount of $2,250,000.  The Debenture is secured pursuant to a Security Agreement (the “Security Agreement”) and a Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignment of Rents and Fixture Filing (the “Mortgage”) entered between AMP Trucks and WCC.  Pursuant to the Security Agreement, AMP Trucks granted WCC a security interest in all of the assets of AMP Trucks in order to secure the prompt payment, performance and discharge in full of all of obligations of AMP Trucks under the Debenture.  Pursuant to the Mortgage, the Debenture is secured by the real estate and related assets of the plant located in Union City, Indiana.  The Debenture matures three years from its effective date of March 13, 2013 (the "Maturity Date") and interest associated with the Debenture is 10% per annum, which is payable on the Maturity Date.  AMP Trucks may prepay outstanding principal and interest of the Debenture in full at any time.  In the event AMP Trucks prepays outstanding principal and interest, it shall pay an amount equal to all outstanding principal and interest multiplied by 105%.   AMP Holding and AMP guaranteed the payment of the Debenture.

 

Our future growth is dependent upon the willingness of operators of commercial vehicle fleets to adopt electric vehicles and on our ability to produce, sell and service vehicles that meet their needs. If the market for commercial electric vehicles does not develop as we expect or develops more slowly than we expect, our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results will be adversely affected.

 

Our growth is dependent upon the adoption of electric vehicles by operators of commercial vehicle fleets and on our ability to produce, sell and service vehicles that meet their needs. The entry of commercial electric vehicles into the medium-duty commercial vehicle market is a relatively new development, particularly in the United States, and is characterized by rapidly changing technologies and evolving government regulation, industry standards and customer views of the merits of using electric vehicles in their businesses. This process has been slow as without including the impact of government or other subsidies and incentives, the purchase prices for our commercial electric vehicles currently is higher than the purchase prices for diesel-fueled vehicles. As part of our sales efforts, we must educate fleet managers as to the economical savings during the life of the vehicle. As such, we believe that operators of commercial vehicle fleets consider a number of factors when deciding whether to purchase our commercial electric vehicles (or commercial electric vehicles generally) or vehicles powered by internal combustion engines, particularly diesel-fueled or natural gas-fueled vehicles. We believe these factors include:

 

the difference in the initial purchase prices of commercial electric vehicles and vehicles with comparable GVWs powered by internal combustion engines, both including and excluding the impact of government and other subsidies and incentives designed to promote the purchase of electric vehicles;

 

8
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

the total cost of ownership of the vehicle over its expected life, which includes the initial purchase price and ongoing operating and maintenance costs;
  
the availability and terms of financing options for purchases of vehicles and, for commercial electric vehicles, financing options for battery systems;
  
the availability of tax and other governmental incentives to purchase and operate electric vehicles and future regulations requiring increased use of nonpolluting vehicles;
  
government regulations and economic incentives promoting fuel efficiency and alternate forms of energy;
  
fuel prices, including volatility in the cost of diesel;
  
the cost and availability of other alternatives to diesel fueled vehicles, such as vehicles powered by natural gas;
  
corporate sustainability initiatives;
  
commercial electric vehicle quality, performance and safety (particularly with respect to lithium-ion battery packs);
  
the quality and availability of service for the vehicle, including the availability of replacement parts;
  
the limited range over which commercial electric vehicles may be driven on a single battery charge;
  
access to charging stations and related infrastructure costs, and standardization of electric vehicle charging systems;
  
electric grid capacity and reliability; and
  
macroeconomic factors.

 

If, in weighing these factors, operators of commercial vehicle fleets determine that there is not a compelling business justification for purchasing commercial electric vehicles, particularly those that we produce and sell, then the market for commercial electric vehicles may not develop as we expect or may develop more slowly than we expect, which would adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.

 

If our customers are unable to efficiently and effectively integrate our electric vehicles into their existing commercial fleets our sales may suffer and our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results may be adversely affected.

 

Our sales strategy involves a comprehensive plan for the pilot and roll-out of our electric vehicles, as well as the ongoing replacement of existing commercial vehicles with our electric vehicles, that is tailored to the individual needs of our customers. If we are unable to develop and execute fleet integration strategies or fleet management support services that meet our customers' unique circumstances with minimal disruption to their businesses, our customers may not realize the economic benefits they expect from our electric vehicles. If this were to occur, our customers may not order additional vehicles from us, which could adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.

 

We currently do not have long-term supply contracts with guaranteed pricing which exposes us to fluctuations in component, materials and equipment prices.  Substantial increases in these prices would increase our operating costs and could adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.

 

Because we currently do not have long-term supply contracts with guaranteed pricing, we are subject to fluctuations in the prices of the raw materials, parts and components and equipment we use in the production of our vehicles.  Substantial increases in the prices for such raw materials, components and equipment would increase our operating costs and could reduce our margins if we cannot recoup the increased costs through increased vehicle prices.  Any attempts to increase the announced or expected prices of our vehicles in response to increased costs could be viewed negatively by our customers and could adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.

 

If we are unable to scale our operations at our Union City facility in an expedited manner from our limited low volume production to high volume production, our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected.

 

We are currently assembling our orders at our Union City facility which is acceptable for our existing orders. In order to satisfy increased demand, we will need to quickly scale operations in our Union City facility as well as scale our supply chain including access to batteries. Our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected if we experience disruptions in our supply chain, if we cannot obtain materials of sufficient quality at reasonable prices or if we are unable to scale our Union City facility.

 

9
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

We depend upon key personnel and need additional personnel.

 

Our success depends on the continuing services of James E. Taylor, Chairman of the Board, Stephen Burns, CEO, and Martin J. Rucidlo, President. On December 8, 2010, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Burns for a term of two years which automatically renews for one year periods unless either of the parties elects to not renew for such period. We entered into a letter agreement in August 2012 with Mr. Taylor whereby Mr. Taylor agreed to serve as the Chairman of the Board of Directors. Mr. Taylor may resign as a director any anytime.   Mr. Rucidlo is not engaged under a long-term employment agreement. The loss of any of these individuals could have a material and adverse effect on our business operations.  Additionally, the success of our operations will largely depend upon its ability to successfully attract and maintain competent and qualified key management personnel.  As with any company with limited resources, there can be no guarantee that we will be able to attract such individuals or that the presence of such individuals will necessarily translate into profitability for our company.  Our inability to attract and retain key personnel may materially and adversely affect our business operations. Any failure by our management to effectively anticipate, implement, and manage the changes required to sustain our growth would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

Our business requires substantial capital, and if we are unable to maintain adequate financing sources our profitability and financial condition will suffer and jeopardize our ability to continue operations.

 

We require substantial capital to support our operations.  In order to fully implement our business plan, we expect that we will need approximately $20,000,000 in capital through 2016. If we are unable to maintain adequate financing, or other sources of capital are not available, we could be forced to suspend, curtail or reduce our operations, which could harm our revenues, ability to achieve profitability, financial condition and business prospects.

 

We face competition. A few of our competitors have greater financial or other resources, longer operating histories and greater name recognition than we do and one or more of these competitors could use their greater resources and/or name recognition to gain market share at our expense or could make it very difficult for us to establish market share.

  

Companies currently competing in the fleet logistics market offering alternative fuel medium duty trucks include Ford Motor Company and Freightliner. In the electric medium duty truck market in the United States, we compete with a few other manufacturers, including Electric Vehicles International and Smith Electric Vehicles. Ford and Freightliner have more significant financial resources, established market positions, long-standing relationships with customers and dealers, and who have more significant name recognition, technical, marketing, sales, financial and other resources than we do.  Ford and Freightliner are currently selling alternative fuel fleet vehicles including hybrids.  The resources available to our competitors to develop new products and introduce them into the marketplace exceed the resources currently available to us.  As a result, our competitors may be able to compete more aggressively and sustain that competition over a longer period of time that we can.  This intense competitive environment may require us to make changes in our products, pricing, licensing, services, distribution, or marketing to develop a market position.  Each of these competitors has the potential to capture market share in our target markets which could have an adverse effect on our position in our industry and on our business and operating results.

  

If we are unable to keep up with advances in electric vehicle technology, we may suffer a decline in our competitive position.

 

There are companies in the electric vehicle industry that have developed or are developing vehicles and technologies that compete or will compete with our vehicles.  We cannot assure that our competitors will not be able to duplicate our technology or provide products and services similar to ours more efficiently.  If for any reason we are unable to keep pace with changes in electric vehicle technology, particularly battery technology, our competitive position may be adversely affected.  We plan to upgrade or adapt our vehicles and introduce new models in order to continue to provide electric vehicles that incorporate the latest technology.  However, there is no assurance that our research and development efforts will keep pace with those of our competitors.

 

Our electric vehicles compete for market share with vehicles powered by other vehicle technologies that may prove to be more attractive than ours.

 

Our target market currently is serviced by manufacturers with existing customers and suppliers using proven and widely accepted fuel technologies.  Additionally, our competitors are working on developing technologies that may be introduced in our target market.  If any of these alternative technology vehicles can provide lower fuel costs, greater efficiencies, greater reliability or otherwise benefit from other factors resulting in an overall lower total cost of ownership, this may negatively affect the commercial success of our vehicles or make our vehicles uncompetitive or obsolete.

 

10
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

We currently have a limited number of customers, with whom we do not have long-term agreements, and expect that a significant portion of our future sales will be from a limited number of customers and the loss of any of these high volume customers could materially harm our business.

 

A significant portion of our projected future revenue, if any, is generated from a limited number of vehicle customers.  Additionally, much of our business model is focused on building relationships with large customers.  Currently we have no contracts with customers that include long-term commitments or minimum volumes that ensure future sales of vehicles.  As such, a customer may take actions that affect us for reasons that we cannot anticipate or control, such as reasons related to the customer’s financial condition, changes in the customer’s business strategy or operations or as the result of the perceived performance or cost-effectiveness of our vehicles.  The loss of or a reduction in sales or anticipated sales to our most significant customers could have an adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.

 

Changes in the market for electric vehicles could cause our products to become obsolete or lose popularity.

 

The modern electric vehicle industry is in its infancy and has experienced substantial change in the last few years.  To date, demand for and interest in electric vehicles has been slower than forecasted by industry experts.  As a result, growth in the electric vehicle industry depends on many factors, including, but not limited to:

 

 

continued development of product technology, especially batteries

     
  the environmental consciousness of customers
     
  the ability of electric vehicles to successfully compete with vehicles powered by internal combustion engines
     
  limitation of widespread electricity shortages; and
     
  whether future regulation and legislation requiring increased use of non-polluting vehicles is enacted

 

We cannot assume that growth in the electric vehicle industry will continue.  Our business may suffer if the electric vehicle industry does not grow or grows more slowly than it has in recent years or if we are unable to maintain the pace of industry demands.

  

The unavailability, reduction, elimination or adverse application of government subsidies, incentives and regulations could have an adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.

  

We believe that, currently, the availability of government subsidies and incentives including those available in New York, California and Chicago is an important factor considered by our customers when purchasing our vehicles, and that our growth depends in part on the availability and amounts of these subsidies and incentives.  Any reduction, elimination or discriminatory application of government subsidies and incentives because of budgetary challenges, policy changes, the reduced need for such subsidies and incentives due to the perceived success of electric vehicles or other reasons may result in the diminished price competitiveness of the alternative fuel vehicle industry.

 

We may be unable to keep up with changes in electric vehicle technology and, as a result, may suffer a decline in our competitive position.

  

Our current products are designed for use with, and are dependent upon, existing electric vehicle technology.  As technologies change, we plan to upgrade or adapt our products in order to continue to provide products with the latest technology.  However, our products may become obsolete or our research and development efforts may not be sufficient to adapt to changes in or to create the necessary technology.  As a result, our potential inability to adapt and develop the necessary technology may harm our competitive position.

 

The failure of certain key suppliers to provide us with components could have a severe and negative impact upon our business.

  

We have secured supply agreements for our critical components including our batteries. However, these are dependent on volume to ensure that they are available at a competitive price. Further, we rely on a small group of suppliers to provide us with components for our products.  If these suppliers become unwilling or unable to provide components or if we are unable to meet certain volume requirements in our existing supply agreements, there are a limited number of alternative suppliers who could provide them.  Changes in business conditions, wars, governmental changes, and other factors beyond our control or which we do not presently anticipate could affect our ability to receive components from our suppliers.  Further, it could be difficult to find replacement components if our current suppliers fail to provide the parts needed for these products.  A failure by our major suppliers to provide these components could severely restrict our ability to manufacture our products and prevent us from fulfilling customer orders in a timely fashion.

 

Product liability or other claims could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

The risk of product liability claims, product recalls, and associated adverse publicity is inherent in the manufacturing, marketing, and sale of electrical vehicles.  Although we have product liability insurance for our consumer and commercial products, that insurance may be inadequate to cover all potential product claims.  We also carry liability insurance on our products.  Any product recall or lawsuit seeking significant monetary damages either in excess of our coverage, or outside of our coverage, may have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.  We may not be able to secure additional product liability insurance coverage on acceptable terms or at reasonable costs when needed.  A successful product liability claim against us could require us to pay a substantial monetary award. Moreover, a product recall could generate substantial negative publicity about our products and business and inhibit or prevent commercialization of other future product candidates.  We cannot provide assurance that such claims and/or recalls will not be made in the future.

 

11
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

We may have to devote substantial resources to implementing a retail product distribution network.

 

Dealers are often hesitant to provide their own financing to contribute to our product distribution network.  As a result, we anticipate that we may have to provide financing or other consignment sale arrangements for dealers.  A capital investment such as this presents many risks, foremost among them being that we may not realize a significant return on our investment if the network is not profitable.  Our inability to collect receivables from dealers could cause us to suffer losses.  Lastly, the amount of time that our management will need to devote to this project may divert them from performing other functions necessary to assure the success of our business.

 

Regulatory requirements may have a negative impact upon our business.

 

While our vehicles are subject to substantial regulation under federal, state, and local laws, we believe that our vehicles are or will be materially in compliance with all applicable laws.  However, to the extent the laws change, or if we introduce new vehicles in the future, some or all of our vehicles may not comply with applicable federal, state, or local laws.  Further, certain federal, state, and local laws and industrial standards currently regulate electrical and electronics equipment.  Although standards for electric vehicles are not yet generally available or accepted as industry standards, our products may become subject to federal, state, and local regulation in the future.  Compliance with these regulations could be burdensome, time consuming, and expensive.

 

Our products are subject to environmental and safety compliance with various federal and state regulations, including regulations promulgated by the EPA, NHTSA, and various state boards, and compliance certification is required for each new model year.  The cost of these compliance activities and the delays and risks associated with obtaining approval can be substantial.  The risks, delays, and expenses incurred in connection with such compliance could be substantial.

 

Our success may be dependent on protecting our intellectual property rights.

 

We rely on trade secret protections to protect our proprietary technology as well as several registered patents and one patent application. Our patents relate to the vehicle chassis assembly, vehicle header and drive module and manifold for electric motor drive assembly. Our existing patent application relates to the onboard generator drive system for electric vehicles.  Our success will, in part, depend on our ability to obtain additional trademarks and patents.  We are working on obtaining patents and trademarks registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office but have not finalized any as of this date.  Although we have entered into confidentiality agreements with our employees and consultants, we cannot be certain that others will not gain access to these trade secrets.  Others may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets.

 

We may be exposed to liability for infringing upon the intellectual property rights of other companies.

 

Our success will, in part, depend on our ability to operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of others.  Although we have conducted searches and are not aware of any patents and trademarks which our products or their use might infringe, we cannot be certain that infringement has not or will not occur.  We could incur substantial costs, in addition to the great amount of time lost, in defending any patent or trademark infringement suits or in asserting any patent or trademark rights, in a suit with another party.

 

Our electric vehicles make use of lithium-ion battery cells, which, if not appropriately managed and controlled, on rare occasions have been observed to catch fire or vent smoke and flames.  If such events occur in our electric vehicles, we could face liability for damage or injury, adverse publicity and a potential safety recall, any of which could adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.

 

The battery packs in our electric vehicles use lithium-ion cells, which have been used for years in laptop computers and cell phones.  On rare occasions, if not appropriately managed and controlled, lithium-ion cells can rapidly release the energy they contain by venting smoke and flames in a manner that can ignite nearby materials.

 

Our facilities could be damaged or adversely affected as a result of disasters or other unpredictable events.  Any prolonged disruption in the operations of our facility would adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.

 

We engineer and assemble our electric vehicles in a facility in Loveland, Ohio and we intend to locate the assembly function to our facility in Union City. Any prolonged disruption in the operations of our facility, whether due to technical, information systems, communication networks, accidents, weather conditions or other natural disaster, or otherwise, whether short or long-term, would adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results .

 

12
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Risks Relating to Our Financial Position and Need for Additional Capital

 

Risks Related to Owning our Common Stock

 

An active trading market for our common stock may not develop, and you may not be able to sell your common stock at or above the initial public offering price.   

 

Prior to the completion of this offering, there has been a limited public market for our common stock. Our common stock is currently traded on the OTC Markets (OTCQB) under the symbol “AMPD”. On December 10, 2014, the last reported sales price of our common stock was $0.15 per share. We intend to change our name to Workhorse Advanced Vehicles Inc. and apply to list our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market (Nasdaq) under the symbol “WAV”. The Series A Warrants will not be listed for trading on a securities exchange. An active trading market for shares of our common stock may never develop or be sustained following this offering. If an active trading market does not develop, you may have difficulty selling your shares of common stock at an attractive price, or at all. The price for our common stock in this offering will be determined by negotiations among us and the underwriters, and it may not be indicative of prices that will prevail in the open market following this offering. Consequently, you may not be able to sell your common stock at or above the initial public offering price or at any other price or at the time that you would like to sell. An inactive market may also impair our ability to raise capital by selling our common stock, and it may impair our ability to attract and motivate our employees through equity incentive awards and our ability to acquire other companies, products or technologies by using our common stock as consideration.

 

The price of our common stock may fluctuate substantially.   

 

You should consider an investment in our common stock to be risky, and you should invest in our common stock only if you can withstand a significant loss and wide fluctuations in the market value of your investment. Some factors that may cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate, in addition to the other risks mentioned in this “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this prospectus, are:

 

    sales of our common stock by our stockholders, executives, and directors;

 

    volatility and limitations in trading volumes of our shares of common stock;

 

    fluctuations in our results of operations;

 

    our ability to develop significant sales;

 

    actual or un-anticipated fluctuations in our annual and quarterly financial results;

 

    our ability to obtain financings to continue and expand our commercial activities, commence our manufacturing operations at our Union City facility, maintain our competitive technological position and other business activities;

 

    our ability to secure resources and the necessary personnel to continue and expand our commercial activities;

 

    changes in our capital structure or dividend policy, including as a result of future issuances of securities and sales of large blocks of common stock by our stockholders;

 

    our cash position;

 

    announcements and events surrounding financing efforts, including debt and equity securities;

 

    reputational issues including issues relating to use of our vehicles by our customers;

 

 

 

 

competition from traditional manufacturers utilizing diesel based engines and alternative fuels including electric or others that may emerge in the future;

       
    the absence of the development of a charging infrastructure;

 

    announcements of acquisitions, partnerships, collaborations, joint ventures, new diagnostic tests, capital commitments, or other events by us or our competitors;

 

    changes in general economic, political and market conditions in the United States;

 

    changes in industry conditions or perceptions;

 

    changes in valuations of similar companies or groups of companies;

 

    analyst research reports, recommendations and changes in recommendations, price targets and withdrawals of coverage;

 

    departures and additions of key personnel;

 

13
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

    disputes and litigations related to intellectual properties, proprietary rights and contractual obligations;

 

    changes in applicable laws, rules, regulations, or accounting practices and other dynamics;

 

    release or expiry of lockup or other transfer restrictions on our outstanding common shares;

 

    announcements or actions taken by our principal stockholders; and

 

    other events or factors, many of which may be out of our control.

 

In addition, if the market for stocks in our industry or industries related to our industry, or the stock market in general, experiences a loss of investor confidence, the trading price of our common stock could decline for reasons unrelated to our business, financial condition and results of operations. If any of the foregoing occurs, it could cause our stock price to fall and may expose us to lawsuits that, even if unsuccessful, could be costly to defend and a distraction to management.

 

An effective registration statement may not be in place when an investor desires to exercise warrants, thus precluding such investor from being able to exercise his, her or its warrants at that time.  

 

No warrant held by an investor will be exercisable and we will not be obligated to issue common stock unless at the time such holder seeks to exercise such warrant, a prospectus relating to the common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrant is current (or an exemption from registration is available) and the common stock has been registered or qualified or deemed to be exempt under the securities laws of the state of residence of the holder of the warrants. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain a current prospectus relating to the common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants until the expiration of the warrants, and if we do not maintain a current prospectus related to the common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants (and an exemption from registration is not available), holders will be unable to exercise their warrants and we will not be required to net cash settle any such warrant exercise. If we are unable to issue the shares upon exercise of the warrants by an investor because there is no current prospectus relating to the common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrant (and an exemption from registration is not available) or the common stock has not been registered or qualified or deemed to be exempt under the securities laws of the state of residence of the holder of the warrants, the warrants will not expire until ten days after the date we are first able to issue the shares. Nevertheless, because an investor may not be able to exercise the warrants at the most advantageous time, the warrants held by an investor may have no value, the market for such warrants may be limited and such warrants may expire worthless.

 

You will incur immediate dilution as a result of this offering.   

 

If you purchase units in this offering, you will pay more for your shares than the net tangible book value of your shares. As a result, you will incur immediate dilution of $         per share, representing the difference between the assumed initial public offering price of $         per share (the midpoint of the range on the cover of this prospectus) and our estimated net tangible book value per share as of             , 2014 of $        . Accordingly, should we be liquidated at our book value, you would not receive the full amount of your investment.

 

Future sales and issuances of our common stock or rights to purchase common stock pursuant to our equity incentive plan could result in additional dilution of the percentage ownership of our stockholders and could cause our share price to fall.   

 

We expect that significant additional capital will be needed in the future to continue our planned operations, including expanding research and development, funding the production of our vehicles, purchasing of capital equipment, hiring new personnel, pursuing sales including developing our dealer network, and continuing activities as an operating public company. To the extent we raise additional capital by issuing equity securities, our stockholders may experience substantial dilution. We may sell common stock, convertible securities or other equity securities in one or more transactions at prices and in a manner we determine from time to time. If we sell common stock, convertible securities or other equity securities in more than one transaction, investors may be materially diluted by subsequent sales. Such sales may also result in material dilution to our existing stockholders, and new investors could gain rights superior to our existing stockholders.

 

Following the closing of this offering and our listing on NASDAQ, there is no guarantee that an active and liquid trading market will develop or that we will be able to continue to maintain our listing.   

 

We will apply to list our shares of common stock trading on NASDAQ. Upon completion of this offering, we believe that we will satisfy the listing requirements and expect that our common stock will be listed on NASDAQ. Neither we nor the underwriters can provide any assurance that an active and liquid trading market in our common stock will develop or, if developed, that the market will continue. Our Board of Directors intends to implement a reverse stock split under NRS Section 78.207 in order to provide that we meet the minimum bid price. There is no guarantee that the reverse stock split will have the desired effect of providing that we satisfy the minimum bid price and, as a result, that we will commence trading on NASDAQ or that we will be able to continue to maintain our listing on NASDAQ.

 

14
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

NASDAQ may delist our common stock from its exchange, which could limit investors’ ability to make transactions in our common stock and subject us to additional trading restrictions.   

 

Even after acceptance by NASDAQ, should we fail to satisfy the continued listing requirements of NASDAQ, such as the corporate governance requirements or the minimum closing bid price requirement, NASDAQ may take steps to delist our common stock. Such a delisting would likely have a negative effect on the price of our common stock and would impair your ability to sell or purchase our common stock when you wish to do so. In the event of a delisting, we would take actions to restore our compliance with NASDAQ’s listing requirements, but we can provide no assurance that any such action taken by us would allow our common stock to become listed again, stabilize the market price or improve the liquidity of our common stock, prevent our common stock from dropping below the NASDAQ minimum bid price requirement or prevent future non-compliance with NASDAQ’s listing requirements.

 

If NASDAQ does not maintain the listing of our securities for trading on its exchange, we could face significant material adverse consequences, including:

 

    a limited availability of market quotations for our securities;

 

    reduced liquidity with respect to our securities;

 

    a determination that our shares of common stock are “penny stock” which will require brokers trading in our shares of common stock to adhere to more stringent rules, possibly resulting in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market for our shares of common stock;

 

    a limited amount of news and analyst coverage for our company; and

 

    decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future.

 

Therefore, it may be difficult to sell any shares you purchase in this offering if you desire or need to sell them. Our lead underwriter, Dawson James Securities, Inc., or Dawson James, is not obligated to make a market in our common stock, and even after making a market, can discontinue market making at any time without notice.

 

The underwriter, Dawson James Securities, Inc. and persons associated with Dawson James Securities, Inc. will benefit from the completion of this offering because they hold warrants to purchase our common stock.

 

In connection with our private placement completed in December 2014 and as described elsewhere in this prospectus, Dawson James was issued an aggregate of (i) warrants to purchase a total of 289,286 shares of our common stock at $0.14 per share and (ii) warrants to purchase a total of shares of our common stock at per share. Subject to waiver rights by Dawson James and other terms and conditions of the lock-up agreements, the holders of these warrants do not have the right to exercise the warrants for 180 days after the effective date of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. The underwriter and its associates will benefit from the completion of this offering because of their ownership of these warrants, particularly if the warrants are exercisable or if they are exercised when the exercise price of the warrants is less than the market price of our stock.

 

Financial reporting obligations of being a public company in the United States are expensive and time consuming, and may place significant demands on our management and other personnel.   

 

The additional obligations of being a public company in the United States require significant expenditures and may place significant demands on our management and other personnel, including costs resulting from public company reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and the rules and regulations regarding corporate governance practices, including those under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or the Dodd-Frank Act, and the listing requirements of the stock exchange on which our securities are listed. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to ensure that we comply with all of these requirements. Any changes that we make to comply with these obligations may not be sufficient to allow us to satisfy our obligations as a public company on a timely basis, or at all.

 

We do not intend to pay cash dividends on our shares of common stock so any returns will be limited to the value of our shares.   

 

We have never paid a cash dividend. We currently anticipate that we will retain future earnings for the development, operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends for the foreseeable future. Any return to stockholders will therefore be limited to the increase, if any, of our share price.

 

Our management will be required to devote substantial time to compliance initiatives.   

 

As a public company, we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a newly formed entity. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules subsequently implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission, referred to herein as the SEC, and NASDAQ, have imposed various new requirements on public companies, including requiring establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and changes in corporate governance practices. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these new compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time consuming and costly. We expect these rules and regulations to make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance and we may be required to incur substantial costs to maintain the same or similar coverage.

 

15
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

The dilutive effect of our warrants could have an adverse effect on the future market price of our ordinary shares or otherwise adversely affect the interests of our ordinary shareholders.   

 

Based on outstanding warrants as of November 20, 2014, there will be outstanding warrants to purchase 53,417,617 of our common shares at a weighted average exercise price of $0.83 per share upon completion of this offering. These warrants are likely to be exercised if the market price of our shares equals or exceeds the warrant exercise price. To the extent such warrants are exercised, additional shares will be issued, which would dilute the ownership of existing shareholders. Further, if the warrants are exercised at any time in the future at a price lower than the book value per share of our ordinary shares, existing shareholders could suffer dilution of their investment.

 

Provisions of our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws and Nevada law could make an acquisition of our Company, which may be beneficial to our stockholders, more difficult and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove the current members of our board and management.   

 

Certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other change of control that stockholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which you might otherwise receive a premium for your shares. Furthermore, these provisions could prevent or frustrate attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove members of our Board of Directors. These provisions also could limit the price  that investors might be willing to pay in the future for our common stock, thereby depressing the market price of our common stock. Stockholders who wish to participate in these transactions may not have the opportunity to do so. These provisions:

 

    authorize our Board of Directors to issue without stockholder approval up to 75,000,000 shares of preferred stock, the rights of which will be determined at the discretion of the Board of Directors that, if issued, could operate as a “poison pill” to dilute the stock ownership of a potential hostile acquirer to prevent an acquisition that is not approved by our Board of Directors;

 

    require that stockholder actions must be effected at a duly called stockholder meeting or by unanimous written consent;

 

    establish advance notice requirements for stockholder nominations to our Board of Directors or for stockholder proposals that can be acted on at stockholder meetings;

 

    limit who may call stockholder meetings; and

 

    require the approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our capital stock entitled to vote in order to amend certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws.

 

In addition, we are governed by the corporate law of the State of Nevada, which may, unless certain criteria are met, prohibit large stockholders, in particular those owning 15% or more of the voting rights on our common stock, from merging or combining with us for a prescribed period of time.

 

Risks Associated with out Proposed Reverse Stock Split

 

The Board of Directors intends to reverse split the common stock and, if it is effected, may not achieve the benefits we intend and our total market capitalization may decrease following the reverse stock split.   

 

As of                  2014, our Board intends to approve an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation to effect a reverse split of our common stock which we refer to as the Reverse Stock Split. Under NRS 78.207, the Board of Directors has the authority to reverse split the outstanding and authorized shares of common stock at an identical ratio solely based on the approval of the Board of Directors and without shareholder approval. Our Board is contemplating a Reverse Stock Split, at any time on or before                  with the final ratio to be determined at the discretion of our Board. Unless we indicate otherwise, the information in this prospectus does not reflect the pro forma impact of the Reverse Stock Split. If we implement the Reverse Stock Split, there can be no assurance that the Reverse Stock Split, if completed, will achieve the benefits that we hope it will achieve. The total market capitalization of our common stock and the company after the Reverse Stock Split may be lower than the total market capitalization before the Reverse Stock Split. We will be subject to certain risks associated with it. 

 

16
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

We intend to effect a 1-for-     Reverse Stock Split of our outstanding common stock prior to the date of this prospectus. However, the Reverse Stock Split may not increase our stock price sufficiently and we may not be able to list our common stock on the NASDAQ.   

 

We expect that a 1-for-     Reverse Stock Split of our outstanding common stock will increase the market price of our common stock so that we will be able to meet the minimum bid price requirement of the Listing Rules of the NASDAQ. However, the effect of a reverse stock split upon the market price of our common stock cannot be predicted with certainty, and the results of reverse stock splits by companies in similar circumstances have been varied. It is possible that the market price of our common stock following the Reverse Stock Split will not permit us to be in compliance with the applicable minimum bid or price requirements. If we are unable meet the minimum bid or price requirements, we may be unable to list our shares on the NASDAQ.

 

Even if the Reverse Stock Split achieves the requisite increase in the market price of our common stock, we cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to comply with the minimum bid price requirement of the NASDAQ.   

 

Even if the Reverse Stock Split achieves the requisite increase in the market price of our common stock to be in compliance with the minimum bid price of the NASDAQ, there can be no assurance that the market price of our common stock following the Reverse Stock Split will remain at the level required for continuing compliance with that requirement. It is not uncommon for the market price of a company’s common stock to decline in the period following a reverse stock split. If the market price of our common stock declines following the effectuation of the Reverse Stock Split, the percentage decline may be greater than would occur in the absence of a Reverse Stock Split. In any event, other factors unrelated to the number of shares of our common stock outstanding, such as negative financial or operational results, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock and jeopardize our ability to meet or maintain the minimum bid price requirement of whichever exchange on which our common stock is listed. In addition to specific listing and maintenance standards, the NASDAQ have broad discretionary authority over the initial and continued listing of securities, which it could exercise with respect to the listing of our common stock.

 

17
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

CAUTIONARY NOTE CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the reasons described in our “Prospectus Summary,” “Use of Proceeds,” “Risk Factors,” “Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Result of Operations,” and “Business” sections. In some cases, you can identify these forward-looking statements by terms such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “depends,” “estimate,” “expects,” “intend,” “may,” “ongoing,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “would” or the negative of those terms or other similar expressions, although not all forward-looking statements contain those words.

 

We have based these forward looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs. These forward looking statements are subject to a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including risks described in the section titled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus, regarding, among other things:

 

 

 

 

management and employee operations and execution risks;

 

a failure to develop sales and the loss of any key customer that we may develop; 

 

    loss of key personnel;

 

    competition in the markets we serve;

 

    intellectual property risks;

 

    our ability to fund our working capital requirements;

 

    risks associated with the uncertainty of future financial results;

 

    risks associated with this offering;

 

    risks associated with raising additional capital when needed and at reasonable terms; and

 

    risks associated with our reliance on third party suppliers of raw materials and other organizations that provide goods and services to us.

 

These risks are not exhaustive. Other sections of this prospectus may include additional factors that could adversely impact our business and financial performance. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for our management to predict all risk factors nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in, or implied by, any forward looking statements.

 

You should not rely upon forward looking statements as predictions of future events. We cannot assure you that the events and circumstances reflected in the forward looking statements will be achieved or occur. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward looking statements for any reason after the date of this prospectus or to conform these statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations.

 

You should read this prospectus and the documents that we reference in this prospectus and have filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part with the understanding that our actual future results, levels of activity, performance and achievements may be materially different from what we expect. We qualify all of our forward looking statements by these cautionary statements.

 

Industry and Market Data

 

This prospectus contains estimates and other statistical data made by independent parties and by us relating to market size and growth and other data about our industry. We obtained the industry and market data in this prospectus from our own research as well as from industry and general publications, surveys and studies conducted by third parties. This data involves a number of assumptions and limitations and contains projections and estimates of the future performance of the industries in which we operate that are subject to a high degree of uncertainty. We caution you not to give undue weight to such projections, assumptions and estimates. Further, industry and general publications, studies and surveys generally state that they have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, although they do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information. While we believe that these publications, studies and surveys are reliable, we have not independently verified the data contained in them. In addition, while we believe that the results and estimates from our internal research are reliable, such results and estimates have not been verified by any independent source.

 

18
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

USE OF PROCEEDS

 

We estimate that the net proceeds from our issuance and sale of                      shares of our common stock in this offering will be approximately $         million, assuming an initial public offering price of $         per share, which is the midpoint of the price range listed on the cover page of this prospectus, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, we estimate that the net proceeds from this offering will be approximately $         million.

 

A $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public offering price of $         per share would increase or decrease the net proceeds from this offering by approximately $         million, assuming that the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions.

 

We expect the net proceeds from this offering will allow us to fund our operations for up to          months following the closing of the offering. We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering as follows:

 

  (1) approximately $         million for developing our sales and service organization;
  (2) approximately $         million for research and development;
  (3) approximately $         million to finance capital expenditures; and
  (4) the remaining proceeds, if any, will be used for general corporate purposes, including working capital.

 

This expected use of net proceeds from this offering represents our intentions based upon our current plans and business conditions. The amounts and timing of our actual expenditures may vary significantly depending on numerous factors, including our ability to materially develop sales and our ability to obtain systems, components, raw materials, parts, manufacturing equipment and other supplies. As a result, our management will retain broad discretion over the allocation of the net proceeds from this offering. We may find it necessary or advisable to use the net proceeds from this offering for other purposes, and we will have broad discretion in the application of net proceeds from this offering. Furthermore, we anticipate that we will need to secure additional funding before we reach profitability.

 

Pending our use of the net proceeds from this offering, we intend to invest the net proceeds in a variety of capital preservation investments, including short-term, investment-grade, interest-bearing instruments and U.S. government securities.

 

19
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

DIVIDEND POLICY

 

We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings to fund the development and expansion of our business. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon a number of factors, including our results of operations, financial condition, future prospects, contractual restrictions, restrictions imposed by applicable law and other factors our board of directors deems relevant. Our future ability to pay cash dividends on our stock may also be limited by the terms of any future debt or preferred securities or future credit facility.

 

20
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

CAPITALIZATION

 

The following table sets forth our unaudited capitalization as of September 30, 2014:

 

    on a pro forma basis to reflect (a) the receipt of net proceeds of $900,000 after September 30, 2014 in consideration of the issuance of the  14% unsecured convertible notes; (b) the issuance of 6,428,571 shares of common stock upon conversion of the 14% unsecured convertible notes and 3,214,286 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the related common stock purchase warrants; and (c) the filing of our amended certificate of incorporation to increase our shares of common stock to 500,000,000; and

 

    on a pro forma as adjusted basis to give effect to our issuance and sale of         shares of our common stock included in the units being sold in this offering at the initial public offering price of $         per unit, which is the midpoint of the price range listed on the cover page of this prospectus, after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions, and our estimated offering expenses.

 

   As of September 30, 2014 
   (unaudited) 
   Actual   Pro Forma   Pro Forma
as
Adjusted
 
     
   $   $   $ 
Stockholders’ equity (deficit) (1):            
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized; 149,057,350 shares issued and outstanding actual;    shares issued and outstanding pro forma;         shares issued and outstanding pro forma as adjusted   149,051           
Additional paid-in-capital   26,992,044           
Accumulated deficit   (32,442,712)          
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)   1,154,594           
                
Total capitalization   5,410,234    $    $ 

 

 

(1) The table above excludes, as of September 30, 2014:

 

    17,152,389 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options outstanding as of September 30, 2014 with a weighted average exercise price of $0.22 per share;

 

    49,914,041 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrants as of September 30, 2014, at a weighted average exercise price of $0.83 per share;

 

    5,104,750 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan;
       
    the pro forma impact of the proposed Reverse Stock Split.

 

You should read this table together with “Selected Financial Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our financial statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

21
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

DILUTION

 

If you invest in our securities, your ownership interest will be diluted to the extent of the difference between the initial public offering price per share of our common stock and the pro forma net tangible book value per share of our common stock after this offering. We calculate net tangible book value per share by dividing the net tangible book value, or tangible assets less total liabilities and preferred shares, by the number of outstanding shares of common stock.

 

Our historical net tangible book deficit as of September 30, 2014 was $32,442,712 million or $0.22 per share of common stock. Our pro forma net tangible book value at September 30, 2014 was $            , or $         per share, based on 149,057,350 shares of our common stock outstanding as of September 30, 2014.

 

After giving effect to the sale of                  units by us at an assumed initial public offering price of $         per share (the mid-point of the price range set forth on the front cover page of this prospectus), less the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and our estimated offering expenses, our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value at September 30, 2014 would be $         million, or $         per share. This amount represents an immediate increase in the pro forma net tangible book value of $         per share to existing stockholders and an immediate dilution of $         per share to new investors purchasing shares at an assumed initial public offering price of $         per share.

 

The following table illustrates this dilution on a per share basis:

  

Assumed initial public offering price per share       $ 
Actual net tangible deficit per share as of September 30, 2014  $0.22    
Pro forma increase per share attributable to conversion of 14% unsecured convertible promissory notes          
Pro forma net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2014, before this offering          
Increase in pro forma net tangible book value per share attributable to new investors          
Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share after this offering          
Dilution in pro forma net tangible book value per share to new investors       $ 

  

A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $         per share would increase (decrease) the pro forma net tangible book value by $         million, the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share after this offering by $         per share and the dilution in pro forma net tangible book value per share to investors participating in this offering by $         per share, assuming that the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

 

If the underwriters exercise in full their option to purchase             additional units in this offering, the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share after the offering would be $         per share, the increase in the pro forma net tangible book value per share to existing stockholders would be $         per share and the dilution to new investors purchasing common stock in this offering would be $         per share.

  

22
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

The following table shows on an adjusted pro forma basis at September 30, 2014, assuming 149,057,350 shares of our common stock outstanding after giving effect to the conversion of all 14% unsecured promissory notes into 6,428,571 shares of common stock, the difference between the number of shares of common stock purchased from us, the total consideration paid to us and the average price paid per share by existing stockholders and by new public investors purchasing common stock in this offering:

 

   Shares Purchased   Total
Consideration
   Average
Price
Per Share
 
   Number   Percent   Amount    Percent       
Existing stockholders        %  $    %  $ 
New investors participating in this offering        %        %  $ 
Total       100%  $    100%  $ 

 

A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $         per share (the mid-point of the price range set forth on the front cover page of this prospectus) would increase (decrease) the total consideration paid by new investors by $         million, or increase (decrease) the percent of total consideration paid by new investors by     %, assuming that the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same.

 

If the underwriters exercise in full their option to purchase additional shares, sales by us in this offering will reduce the percentage of shares held by existing stockholders to     % and will increase the number of shares held by new investors to     , or     %.

 

This information is based on 149,057,350 shares of common stock outstanding as of September 30, 2014, and assumes the conversion of all of our 14% unsecured convertible notes outstanding as of September 30, 2014 into 6,428,571 shares of common stock upon the completion of this offering and excludes: 

 

    17,152,389 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options outstanding as of September 30, 2014 with a weighted average exercise price of $0.22 per share;

 

    49,914041 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrants as of September 30, 2014, at a weighted average exercise price of $0.83 per share;

 

    5,104,750 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan;
       
    the pro forma impact of the proposed Reverse Stock Split.

 

To the extent these outstanding options or warrants are exercised there will be further dilution to the new investors.

 

Furthermore, we may choose to raise additional capital due to market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. To the extent we issue additional shares of common stock or other equity or convertible debt securities in the future, there will be further dilution to investors participating in this offering.

 

If all our outstanding options and warrants noted above had been exercised, the pro forma net tangible book value as of September 30, 2014 would have been $        , or $         per share, and the as adjusted pro forma net tangible book value after this offering would have been $        , or $         per share, causing dilution to new investors of $         per share. Additionally, assuming all outstanding options and warrants noted above had been exercised, the difference between the number of shares of common stock purchased from us, the total consideration paid to us, and the average price paid per share by existing stockholders and by new investors purchasing common stock in this offering would be as follows:

 

   Shares Purchased   Total
Consideration
   Average
Price
Per Share
 
   Number  Percent   Amount   Percent     
Existing stockholders        %  $    %  $ 
New investors participating in this offering        %        %  $ 
Total       100%  $    100%  $ 

 

In addition, we may choose to raise additional capital due to market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. To the extent that additional capital is raised through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of these securities may result in further dilution to our stockholders.

 

23
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 and selected balance sheet data as of December 31, 2012 and 2013 were derived from our audited financial statements that are included elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected statement of operations data for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2014 and selected balance sheet data as of September 30, 2014 were derived from our unaudited financial statements that are included elsewhere in this prospectus. In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements were prepared on a basis consistent with our audited financial statements contained in this prospectus and include all adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of the financial information contained in those statements. The historical results presented below are not necessarily indicative of financial results to be achieved in future periods, and the results for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full year.

 

   Years Ended
December 31,
   Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
   2012   2013   2013   2014 
                 
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:                
Sales  $272,098   $177,500   $177,500   $177,459 
                     
Operating Expenses                    
Selling, general and administrative   2,329,398    3,137,288    2,504,110    2,521,695 
Research and development   1,984,302    2,892,505    2,285,637    2,364,686 
Total operating expenses   4,313,700    6,029,793    4,789,746    4,886,381 
                     
Interest expense, net   230,887    258,261    179,029    92,218 
                     
  Net loss during the development stage  $(4,272,489)  $(6,110,554)  $(4,791,275)  $(4,801,140)
                     
Basic and diluted loss per share  $(0.10)  $(0.08)  $(0.07)  $(0.03)
                     
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding   44,915,220    75,710,613    73,164,046    149,057,350 

  

24
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

   As of December 31,   As of September 30, 2014 
   2012   2013   Actual (1)   Pro Forma (2)   Pro Forma as Adjusted (3) 
               (unaudited)     
Assets                         
Current assets:                         
Cash and cash equivalents   39,819    7,019    833,834         
Inventory   41,002    392,750    392,750           
Prepaid expenses and deposits   13,025    43,967    70,965           
    93,846    443,736    1,297,549           
                          
Property, plant and equipment net   126,847    4,407,261    4,112,685           
                          
    220,693    4,850,997    5,410,234           
                          
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)                         
Current liabilities:                         
Accounts payable   1,253,228    1,546,388    1,369,206           
Accounts payable, related parties   336,556    468,165                
Customer deposits   60,000    177,500                
Shareholder advances   558,000    1,934,300                
Current portion of long-term debt   230,756    338,225    37,548           
    2,438,540    4,464,578    1,760,396           
                          
Long-term debt   362,186    2,292,890    2,495,244           
                          
Stockholders' equity (deficit):                         
Series A preferred stock   -    -                
Common stock, par value of $.001 per share   55,955    82,712    149,051           
Additional paid-in capital   14,956,547    20,321,536    26,992,044           
Stock based compensation   3,778,723    5,171,093    6,456,211           
Accumulated deficit during the development stage   (21,371,258)   (27,481,812)   (32,442,712)          
    (2,580,033)   (1,906,471)   1,154,594           
                          
    220,693    4,850,997    5,410,234           

 

 

(1) Excludes net proceeds of $900,000 from the sale of 14% unsecured convertible notes.

 

(2) Pro forma balance sheet data give effect to net proceeds of $900,000 from the sale of 14% unsecured convertible promissory notes.

 

(3) The pro forma as adjusted balance sheet data above reflects the issuance of         shares of our common stock upon the completion of this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $         per share (the mid-point of the price range on the front cover of this prospectus) after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, as if this offering occurred on September 30, 2014.

 

25
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with “Selected Financial Data” and our financial statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. In addition to historical information, this discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those discussed below. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those identified below, and those discussed in the section titled “Risk Factors” included elsewhere in this prospectus. All amounts in this report are in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted.

 

Our Company

 

Overview

 

AMP Holding Inc., which is in the process of changing its name to Workhorse Advanced Vehicles Inc., designs and produces high-performance electric vehicles (EVs) specifically engineered to enable our fleet customers to deliver goods and services with minimal environmental impact while reducing costs by 50% as compared to standard gas powered vehicles. Our new vehicles will be assembled at our 270,000 sq. ft. Indiana facility, which has a capacity to produce up to 60,000 complete chassis per year. Our medium duty vehicles come in two models: the Workhorse E-100 all-electric truck and the E-GEN™ electric truck with on board charging. Over the life of the vehicle, the Workhorse E-GEN™ potentially offers a savings of $100,000, with the savings beginning immediately as compared to standard gas delivery vehicles, and a positive return on investment (ROI) by year three based on current gasoline and electricity costs. We believe these electric trucks represent the future of logistics by creating both economic and environmental benefits.

 

Customers

 

On June 16, 2014 we received an initial order for two E-GEN vehicles from a major transportation company that operates one of the world’s largest fleets of delivery vehicles. The vehicles will be deployed by February 2015. This initial order was followed by a larger purchase agreement that Workhorse has entered into with this company to supply a total of 18 Workhorse E-100 all-electric walk in vans to be deployed in the Houston-Galveston-Brazonia, Texas area. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Energy Technology Laboratory awarded a grant to accelerate the introduction of electric vehicles to improve local air quality in the Houston-Galveston-Brazonia area, which is currently designated as a National Ambient Air Quality Non-Attainment Area.

 

Vehicles

 

In addition to building its own chassis, AMP designs and produces two, second-generation, battery-electric drive trains both powered by Panasonic 18650 Li Ion cells. AMP’s E-100 V.2 all electric drive train features a 100 kWh battery pack offering a range of up to 100 miles. AMP’s E-GEN, introduced in 2014, is its newest drive train employing a 2200 nm permanent magnet electric drive motor coupled to a small internal combustion engine (ICE) that drives the electric motor in generator mode to keep the battery pack within the desired level of charge.

 

HorseFly™

 

Our unique HorseFly line of drones is designed to be the ‘last mile’ solution in delivery logistics. We worked with the University of Cincinnati to develop the HorseFly to meet the rigors of package delivery and to have eight rotors and redundant systems to ensure safety in the air. Today, we estimate that it costs approximately $1 to move a 20,000-pound diesel-powered truck one mile.  While we believe our Workhorse trucks can reduce the standard delivery costs from $1 to less than $0.30 cents per mile based on current costs of fuel, We expect that having drones handle the last leg of delivery could further potentially reduce the cost to about $.03 cents for the last mile. The all weather HorseFly battery-powered drone will carry up to 10 pounds of cargo with a 15-mile range. It is designed to meet the anticipated FAA drone guidelines expected in 2015, of which there is no guarantee, and is differentiated from other drones as it is designed to work in tandem with a Workhorse electric truck. HorseFly will deliver packages, loaded on-route by the truck's driver, to remote locations while the driver continues on the main delivery route. HorseFly will then rejoin the truck at its new location after its delivery is completed, saving the fleet operator much of the time and fuel cost of the last, most expensive, mile. Also while the HorseFly is atop the Workhorse truck, it can quickly charge its batteries from the truck's large battery pack.  We believe this implementation is superior to the proposed deployment of other delivery drones wherein the package is loaded at a distant warehouse and the drone must make a round trip flight to the delivery address and back to the warehouse.  Other applications for the HorseFly include transmission line inspections and agricultural surveys.

 

26
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Facilities

 

In March of 2013, we purchased the former Workhorse Custom Chassis assembly plant in Union City, Indiana from a subsidiary of Navistar International with the goal of transforming the company into the leading producer of electric medium duty trucks in the United States. To our knowledge, Workhorse Advanced Vehicles is the only commercial electric vehicle OEM in the country.

 

With the purchase we acquired a 220,000 sq. ft. factory, a 50,000 sq. ft. engineering facility, all the intellectual property and patents, and access to the 440 Workhorse dealers across the U.S., and established a supply agreement with its parts supplier UpTime parts. The mechanical, electrical and software design and engineering is done at our Cincinnati, Ohio headquarters. Ownership of this plant enables us to build new chassis with gross vehicle weight capacities of between 10,000 and 26,000 pounds and offer them with four different fuel variants—electric, gas, propane (LPG) and compressed natural gas (CNG).

 

Results of Operations

 

Three and Nine Months ended September 30, 2014 Compared to Three and Nine Months ended September 30, 2013

 

Our condensed consolidated statement of operations data for the period presented follows:

  

   Three Months Ended
September 30
   Nine Months Ended
September 30
 
   2014   2013   2014   2013 
                     
Sales  $-   $177,500   $177,459   $177,500 
                     
Operating Expenses                    
Selling, general and administrative   797,195    585,205    2,521,695    2,504,110 
Research and development   895,669    562,425    2,364,686    2,285,637 
Total operating expenses   1,692,864    1,147,630    4,886,381    4,789,746 
                     
Interest expense, net   95,001    75,034    251,978    179,029 
                     
Net loss during the development stage  $(1,787,865)  $(1,045,164)  $(4,960,900)  $(4,791,275)

 

Revenue

 

We generated revenue of $177,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 for the delivery of an all-electric Para-transit 12 passenger bus to BARTA (Berks County Regional Transit Authority) of Pennsylvania. We generated revenue of $177,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 for half of the order to BARTA delivered during 2013.

 

We have received two orders totaling 18 vehicles from a major transportation company which we are in the process of filling and that we expect to deliver in the next 12 months.

 

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel and facilities costs related to our development including, marketing, sales, executive, finance, human resources, information technology and professional, legal and contract services.

  

Selling, general and administrative expenses during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 were $797,000 and $2.5 million, respectively, an increase from $585,000 and $2.5 million from the three months and nine month ended September 30, 2013, respectively.  The $212,000 increase in the three months ended in September 30, 2014 is mainly due to additions in employee expenses, and stock based compensation as a result of increased activity in the building of new customer orders. The $17,000 increase in the nine months ended September 30, 2014 is due higher levels of expense mainly in stock based compensation.

 

Research and Development Expenses

  

Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel costs for our teams in engineering and research, prototyping expense, and contract and professional services.  Union City plant expenses prior to the start of production are also included in research and development expenses.

 

27
TABLE OF CONTENTS

  

Research and development expenses during the three months and nine ended in September 30, 2014 were approximately $896,000 and $2.4 million, respectively, an increase from $562,000 and $2.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively.  The $333 increase for the three months ended in September 30, 2014 is the result of higher engineering consulting expense as well as increments in motors and batteries for E-Gen prototypes. The $79,000 increase for the nine months ended in September 30, 2013 is mainly the effect of increased prototype activities compared to last year.

  

Interest Expenses

 

Our interest expense is incurred primarily from our long term loan with Navistar in connection to the purchase of the Union City plant mentioned before in the Property, Plant and Equipment and Long Term Loan notes to the financial statements.

 

Interest expenses during the three and nine months ended in September 30, 2014 were approximately $95,000 thousand and $252,000 respectively, an increase from $75,000 and $179,000 during the three and nine months ended in September 30, 2013, respectively.  The $20,000 and $74,000 increase was mainly due to the fact that we had just completed the purchase during the month of March 2013 so no interests needed to be accrued early in that quarter.  Also interests on the loan are capitalized to the principal and payable after three years and we capitalized the first year of interests in March 2014.

  

Year Ended December 31, 2013 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2012

 

Revenue   

 

Revenue was $177,500 for the year ended December 31, 2013 for the all-electric Para-transit 12 passenger bus to BARTA mentioned above. Revenue was $272,098 for the year ended December 31, 2012 and consisted of a limited number of customer passenger vehicle conversions which we are no longer actively engaged.

 

Expenses  

 

Our expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 were $6,288,053 and included payroll and payroll taxes ($1,527,952), stock based compensation ($1,392,370), consulting ($1,088,818) legal and professional ($441,439), interests ($258,261), and batteries, motors and supplies and vehicle testing ($397,617).  Our expenses for the year ended December 31, 2012 were $4,544,587 and included payroll and payroll taxes ($1,773,232), stock based compensation ($338,853), legal and professional ($709,883), advertising ($429,483), and batteries, motors and supplies ($240,907).  The major reasons for the increase in comparing the year ended 2013 to 2012 was primarily related to non-cash payments for consulting fees associated with the Workhorse Plant acquisition and plant expenses as well as the development of the new Gen II and E-Gen technologies.

 

Net loss  

 

Net loss for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were $6,110,554 and $4,272,489, respectively.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Summary of Cash Flows

 

   Three Months Ended
September 30
   Nine Months Ended
September 30
 
   2014   2013   2014   2013 
                     
Net cash used in operating activities   (963,231)   (730,923)   (2,857,862)   (2,235,170)
Net cash used in investing activities   -    (63)   -    (2,750,063)
Net cash provided by financing activities   (9,111)   592,911    3,684,677    4,952,877 

  

28
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

  

Our cash flows from operating activities are affected by our cash investments to support the business in research and development, manufacturing, selling, general and administrative. Our operating cash flows are also affected by our working capital needs to support fluctuations in inventory, personnel expenses, accounts payable and other current assets and liabilities.

  

Net cash used in operating activities was $2.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The largest component of our cash used during this was to our net loss of $5 million, which included non-cash charges such as depreciation of $295,000, stock based compensation of $1.3 million, consulting services paid in stock of $795,000, capitalization of accrued interests of $225,000 on the Navistar long term loan and increase in accounts payable of $452,000. Operating cash outflows for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 were primarily related to research and development expenses of $2.5 million and operating expenses of $2.5 million, in addition to payment of accounts payable for related parties for $756,000.

 

Net cash used in operating activities was $2.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The main component of our cash used during this periods related to our net loss of $4.8 million, which included non-cash charges such as depreciation of $218,000, stock based compensation of $1.2 million and consulting services paid in stock of $860,000. Operating cash outflows for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 were primarily related to research and development expenses of $2.2 million and operating expenses of $2.5 million, partially offset by $142,000 increase in customer deposits and $159,000 in accounts payable.

  

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

  

Cash flow from investing activities primarily relates to capital expenditures to support our future growth in operations including the investments made in the Union City plant.

  

There was no cash used in investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The $2.7 million used during the nine months ended in September 30, 2013 were mainly invested in the Union City Plant purchase.

  

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

  

Net cash provided by financing activities was $4.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and was comprised primarily of $4 million net of issuance of common stock offset by payments of $323 thousand for long term debt.

  

Net cash provided by financing activities was $7.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and was comprised primarily of $4.3 million of issuance of common stock and the increase of long term debt of $2.25 million for the loan to Navistar for the purchase of the Union City plant.

  

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

  

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the Company's financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

  

Federal Tax Credit Qualification by the IRS & Select State Incentive Programs

  

The Company has been qualified by the IRS for a vehicle federal tax credit of up to $7,500.  The Company joins a list of plug-in electric drive motor vehicle manufacturers, including Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation, Tesla, Toyota, and 13 EV manufacturers in all, qualifying purchasers for up to a $7,500 tax credit when purchasing an electric vehicle.  In September 2013, California HVIP approved the AMP E-100 truck for a minimum point of purchase voucher of $90,000 per vehicle purchased. On August 9, 2013 NYSERDA the New York State point of purchase voucher program approved the AMP E-100 for an incentive of $60,000 per vehicle. Drive Clean Chicago recently approved vouchers of $60,000 for the AMP E-100 and $32,800 for the AMP E-GEN.

  

Critical Accounting Policies

  

We consider accounting policies involving significant judgments and assumptions by management that have, or could have, a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets or on income (loss) to be critical accounting policies.  We consider the following to be our critical accounting policies:  basis of presentation, development-stage Company, revenue recognition, and income taxes.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

We are exposed to market risk in the ordinary course of our business. We do not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes. Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our financial position due to adverse changes in financial market prices and rates. Our market exposure is primarily a result of fluctuations in interest rates, however, we do not believe there is material exposure to interest rate risk. We also do not believe we are exposed to material risk resulting from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates due to (a) the level of our international sales, which comprised 3.2% and 3.0% of our total revenues during the year ended December 31, 2013 and the six month period ended September 30, 2014, respectively and (b) our current practice of conducting international sales in U.S. dollars.

 

29
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Controls and Procedures

 

Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting relating to the processes and controls to properly identify and account for transactions of a complex or non-routine nature and the process and controls of our period closing procedures. We are currently in the process of reviewing, documenting and testing our internal control over financial reporting. Although remediation efforts are still in progress, management is taking steps to address the causes of our audit adjustments and to improve our internal control over financial reporting, including the implementation of new accounting processes and control procedures and the identification of gaps in our skills base and expertise of the staff required to meet the financial reporting requirements of a public company. For example, in October of 2013 we hired accounting consultants to provide the necessary staffing and we intend to continue to work with these consultants as we hire qualified permanent employees. We have not engaged an independent registered public accounting firm to perform an audit of our internal control over financial reporting as of any balance sheet date or for any period reported in our financial statements.

 

30
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

BUSINESS

 

Unless the context requires otherwise references to “AMP Holding Inc.” “AMP Holding”, our “company,” “we,” “us” or “our” refer to AMP Holding Inc., a Nevada corporation, doing business as AMP Holding. AMP Holding primarily manages its operations through its two wholly-owned subsidiaries, AMP Trucks Inc. (“AMP Trucks”), an Indiana corporation, and AMP Electric Vehicles Inc., an Ohio corporation (“AMP”).

 

Our Company

 

Overview

 

AMP Holding Inc., which is in the process of changing its name to Workhorse Advanced Vehicles Inc., designs and produces high-performance electric vehicles (EVs) specifically engineered to enable our fleet customers to deliver goods and services with minimal environmental impact while reducing costs by 50% as compared to standard gas powered vehicles. Our new vehicles will be assembled at our 270,000 sq. ft. Indiana facility, which has a capacity to produce up to 60,000 complete chassis per year. Our medium duty vehicles come in two models: the Workhorse E-100 all-electric truck and the E-GEN™ electric truck with on board charging. Over the life of the vehicle, the Workhorse E-GEN™ potentially offers a savings of $100,000, with the savings beginning immediately as compared to standard gas delivery vehicles, and a positive return on investment (ROI) by year three based on current gasoline and electricity costs. We believe these electric trucks represent the future of logistics by creating both economic and environmental benefits.

 

Customers

 

On June 16, 2014 we received an initial order for two E-GEN vehicles from a major transportation company that operates one of the world’s largest fleets of delivery vehicles. The vehicles will be deployed by February 2015. This initial order was followed by a larger purchase agreement that Workhorse has entered into with this company to supply a total of 18 Workhorse E-100 all-electric walk in vans to be deployed in the Houston-Galveston-Brazonia, Texas area. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Energy Technology Laboratory awarded a grant to accelerate the introduction of electric vehicles to improve local air quality in the Houston-Galveston-Brazonia area, which is currently designated as a National Ambient Air Quality Non-Attainment Area.

 

Government Incentives

 

Our trucks qualify for financial incentives to lower the purchase price of an EV truck in states and cities including New York, California, and Chicago. Without these current incentives, our logistics solutions still offer a 50 % cost advantage as compared to traditional gas vehicles.

 

Market Size & Distribution Channels

 

In the market for electric logistics vehicles, we directly address the step van/strip chassis market. The market segments our vehicles serve include package and product delivery companies, uniform and laundry services, food services, utilities, and special-use industries. Companies operating in the space that are potential customers for AMP include UPS, FedEx, Bimbo Bakeries, Aramark, Canada Post, Cintas, Purolator, Peapod, UniFirst, and Frito Lay. We have sold our initial vehicles through our internal sales force but have the ability to sell our Workhorse vehicles through a distribution channel of approximately 440 dealers nationwide.

 

Vehicles

 

In addition to building its own chassis, AMP designs and produces two, second-generation, battery-electric drive trains both powered by Panasonic 18650 Li Ion cells. AMP’s E-100 V.2 all electric drive train features a 100 kWh battery pack offering a range of up to 100 miles. AMP’s E-GEN, introduced in 2014, is its newest drive train employing a 2200 nm permanent magnet electric drive motor coupled to a small internal combustion engine (ICE) that drives the electric motor in generator mode to keep the battery pack within the desired level of charge.

 

Market Entry

 

Based on market experience, we believe that the duty cycle of the average medium-duty local delivery truck market represents the appropriate entry point to launch electric trucks due to the quick financial payback associated with electrification. To our knowledge, our Workhorse E-GEN™ electric truck, which has an EPA approved on-board internal combustion engine, provides a three-year payback without any government financial incentives. Over the typical 10-year life of a medium-duty delivery truck, our Workhorse E-GEN electric truck is designed to save its owner over $100,000 in fuel and maintenance savings, a projected 75% reduction in costs compared to gas powered vehicles based on current fuel and electricity costs.

 

31
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Our Workhorse E-GEN electric truck is the first of its kind. Purpose-built for the package delivery vehicle market, it is expected to offer three-times the miles per gallon than typical gasoline-powered vans in use today. The E-GEN power train is unique in that it employs a 2200 nm permanent magnet motor/generator for propulsion plus a 2.4 Liter internal combustion engine that turns the electric motor in generator mode to recharge the battery pack under certain conditions i.e. the battery pack falls below a predetermined level, the vehicle is in park with the key out, and the emergency brake is on. As such, it can be charging while the driver stops the vehicle to make a delivery or pauses for lunch.

 

We believe the E-GEN will change the economics of EV acquisition by reducing battery costs, which in the past has been an impediment to the mass adoption of commercial EVs. By integrating Panasonic 18650 batteries with our proprietary battery management system, control software, charging innovations, and mechanical packaging, we are able to keep total vehicle cost at an attractive price point. At the same time, AMP is continually assessing battery technology and applications.

 

HorseFly™

 

Our unique HorseFly line of drones is designed to be the ‘last mile’ solution in delivery logistics. We worked with the University of Cincinnati to develop the HorseFly to meet the rigors of package delivery and to have eight rotors and redundant systems to ensure safety in the air. Today, we estimate that it costs approximately $1 to move a 20,000-pound diesel-powered truck one mile.  While we believe our Workhorse trucks can reduce the standard delivery costs from $1 to less than $0.30 cents per mile based on current costs of fuel, We expect that having drones handle the last leg of delivery could further potentially reduce the cost to about $.03 cents for the last mile. The all weather HorseFly battery-powered drone will carry up to 10 pounds of cargo with a 15-mile range. It is designed to meet the anticipated FAA drone guidelines expected in 2015, of which there is no guarantee, and is differentiated from other drones as it is designed to work in tandem with a Workhorse electric truck. HorseFly will deliver packages, loaded on-route by the truck's driver, to remote locations while the driver continues on the main delivery route. HorseFly will then rejoin the truck at its new location after its delivery is completed, saving the fleet operator much of the time and fuel cost of the last, most expensive, mile. Also while the HorseFly is atop the Workhorse truck, it can quickly charge its batteries from the truck's large battery pack.  We believe this implementation is superior to the proposed deployment of other delivery drones wherein the package is loaded at a distant warehouse and the drone must make a round trip flight to the delivery address and back to the warehouse.  Other applications for the HorseFly include transmission line inspections and agricultural surveys.

 

Facilities

 

In March of 2013, we purchased the former Workhorse Custom Chassis assembly plant in Union City, Indiana from a subsidiary of Navistar International with the goal of transforming the company into the leading producer of electric medium duty trucks in the United States. To our knowledge, Workhorse Advanced Vehicles is the only commercial electric vehicle OEM in the country.

 

With the purchase we acquired a 220,000 sq. ft. factory, a 50,000 sq. ft. engineering facility, all the intellectual property and patents, and access to the 440 Workhorse dealers across the U.S., and established a supply agreement with its parts supplier UpTime parts. The mechanical, electrical and software design and engineering is done at our Cincinnati, Ohio headquarters. Ownership of this plant enables us to build new chassis with gross vehicle weight capacities of between 10,000 and 26,000 pounds and offer them with four different fuel variants—electric, gas, propane (LPG) and compressed natural gas (CNG).

 

Intellectual Property

 

We have six issued patents and two pending in the U.S. We also plan to pursue appropriate foreign patent protection. AMP also has five pending trademark applications and two issued trademark registrations in the U.S. with intent to pursue foreign trademark registration as well.

 

Competitive Landscape

 

We believe our ability to meet fleet performance specifications and reduce vehicle lifecycle costs affords us significant advantages over competing EVs. Other companies currently competing in the EV fleet logistics market include Ford Motor Company, Freightliner, Smith Electric Vehicles, and Electric Vehicles International. Batteries are the most expensive part of an EV. Workhorse uses Panasonic LI batteries; therefore our E-GEN battery packs are under $20,000 since they can be recharged from the ICE, as compared to the industry’s average battery pack cost of $72,000. Competing EV trucks have limited range because they are electric only. Our EPA-approved E-GEN emergency range electric, medium-duty truck offers greater range since the truck can recharge when parked. As an OEM, our manufacturing costs are lower as compared to competitors that are installing their drive trains into chassis from another manufacturer.

 

32
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Management Team

 

Our executive team has deep experience in the automotive industry, engineering field, and public company management. Our Chairman has 34 years of automotive and engineering management experience and was CEO of Hummer and General Manager of Cadillac. Our Founder and CEO is a veteran entrepreneur who has founded several successful start-ups, while our CFO has 35 years of financial management experience at several public companies. Our engineering executives are from Navistar, Autocar LLC, Procter and Gamble, and the United States Naval Research Lab. 

 

Our Products

 

Powertrain :

 

E-GEN

In January 2014, we submitted a provisional patent application for a new drive system.  This revolutionary design is an extended range electric drive system that we call the E-GEN Drive.  This system is an electric drive that has a gasoline/propane or CNG engine that functions as an auxiliary generator that only runs when the battery reaches a certain level of depletion, the vehicle is in PARK, the key is out and the emergency break is on.  This system combines battery-electric propulsion with a low-horsepower, fossil fuel engine that powers the electric motor in generator mode to produce a vehicle that gets two to four times the miles per gallon of its conventional counterpart, thus providing the fleet operator with a solution that has a three-year payback without any government incentives. We believe that this is the ideal solution for the domestic package delivery fleet operators as well as other specialized markets (i.e. shuttle, school, public transportation buses, and specialty-use vehicles). The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) considers it an electric vehicle and has approved it for on-road use. Trucks equipped with E-GEN Drive qualify for $32,800 incentives from the Drive Clean Chicago program

 

 

 

Our approach to the commercial market is to provide alternative-fueled chassis at competitive prices that are as reliable and consistent, in all aspects, as the Navistar chassis that last rolled off the line in the   last quarter of 2012.  Our sales strategy targets the top fleet buyers.  We have forged an arrangement for logistics support with UpTime Parts, Inc. and structured an engine supply agreement with Power Solutions International.

 

We are focused on the extended range electric E-GEN solution since it offers the customer a solution that provides answers to their key concerns with electric vehicles (i.e. range issues in cold weather, peak season requirements, infrastructure costs, and “what are my options if there is a power outage?”).

 

E-100

Our AMP E-100 all-electric, medium-duty truck employs our second-generation full electric power-train that is a significant improvement to our first generation.  It includes a single electric motor with no transmission and new lighter, high-density Lithium Ion batteries giving it a range of up to 100 miles.  This application has received California Air Resources Board approval for sale in California and is now on the California HVIP list and eligible for incentive purchase. Additionally, we are also approved in New York under the NYSERDA Program and approved for both new trucks and repowers under the Drive Clean Chicago incentive program.

  

33
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Chassis:

  

W88

The new W88 chassis is designed to meet the needs of a wide range of customers. At the same time, it is a universal chassis from an operations perspective.  We believe that this chassis will be the workhorse of our product offerings.  We expect to offer this chassis with gross vehicle weight GVW ratings of 10,000 to 26,000 pounds.  It will also be offered with drive train and fuel systems ranging from all-electric , extended range electric EREV utilizing gasoline, propane or CNG, PSI gasoline 6-liter engine, propane, and CNG.

 

W22

The W22 chassis is designed to meet the needs of the recreational vehicle market for weight ratings up to 26,000 GVW. It has been in the marketplace for over ten years and is well-proven for this application.  If we elect to pursue the RV market, we will offer this chassis with an engine that is competitive and at the same time has market acceptance and appeal in the RV sector. We believe the PSI 8.8 Liter multi-fuel engine has market appeal for the RV market.

 

Applications for these Products:

 

Commercial Step Vans

 

Package Delivery Industry: Approximately 80% of the vehicles in this segment operate on a fixed route and travel fewer than 100 miles per day, stop more than 100 times within an average duty cycle of eight to ten hours, and return to an indoor distribution center. The best examples include: UPS, FEDEX, FEDEX Ground, DHL and Purolator.

 

Product Delivery Industry: Approximately 70% of the vehicles in this segment operate on a fixed route and travel fewer than 100 miles per day, stop between 50 and 100 times within an average duty cycle of eight to ten hours, and return to a distribution center that is either indoors, or the vehicles are stored at the dock, or in an outdoor lot adjacent to the distribution facility. Examples are: Frito-Lay, Pepsi, Coke, Aramark, Bimbo Bakeries, Peapod and other grocery delivery services.

 

Laundry and Uniform Service Industry: Approximately 60% of the vehicles in this segment operate on a fixed route and travel approximately 100 miles per day, stop between 30 and 50 times within an average duty cycle of eight to ten hours, and return to a laundry facility where the vehicles are stored outside the facility. Cintas, Aramark, UniFirst and Diaper Service are examples.

 

Food Service Industry: Approximately 80% of the vehicles in this segment operate on a fixed route and travel approximately 100 miles per day stopping between 10 and 30 times within an average duty cycle of eight to ten hours. They return to a commissary facility where the vehicles are stored outside the facility and serviced at this common facility. Food trucks fall into this category.

 

Utility Industry: The route that these vehicles follow is dependent on the utility and the energy company’s territory. Some utilities, for example, are captive to a county or surrounding counties of one large metro area. This model is ideal for a segment of the fleet to be all electric utility vehicles. For the utilities that cover the entire state or even multiple states, CNG, or Hybrid CNG/Electric vehicles are required.

 

Special Use Industry: This segment basically consists of what is not already mentioned including. SWAT, Warehouse on Wheels i.e. Snap-on-Tools, HVAC, Plumbers, and other service applications that require a large cube storage vehicle fit into this category.

 

The current number of commercial step vans in use in the US is approximately 320,000 units. Today between 3% and 4% are replaced with new vehicles every year. A number of the larger fleets that effectively utilize this type of vehicle replace vehicles at a rate closer to 7% per year.  We believe that with the proper mix of alternative fuel options combined with purpose-built chassis for specific use in this segment will result in a replacement rate of as much as 10% in the initial transition period and then a 5% to 7% overall rate long term.

 

Medium Duty Buses

 

We believe we could potentially access through the sale of the medium duty bus (108”H x 95.5 W x 247”to 286” L). Para-Transit, Shuttle and School Buses are part of this segment.  We are able to offer alternative fuel solutions, as well as innovative E-GEN EREV solutions combined with the AMP/Workhorse chassis.

 

Special Use Vehicles

 

The special use vehicle segment includes emergency vehicles, wreckers, construction equipment, communications equipment and military base application.  This segment is similar to Medium-duty buses in terms of volume potential.

 

34
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Recreational Vehicles (RV)

 

The final segment that we believe will have significant volume potential for us is the Class 5 and 6 RV chassis market. We believe that the right combination of drive system and Workhorse chassis has the potential to capture a significant portion of the market. Currently, RV manufacturers only have one option if they want to purchase a class 5 or 6 gasoline chassis for an RV application.

 

Technology

 

Batteries Are Key

 

The battery pack is key to the design, development, and manufacture of advanced electric-vehicle power trains. Where some other EV manufacturers purchase their batteries in a plug-and-play pack, we build our own battery packs. This keeps the intellectual property related to the design and production of the pack in-house and avoids the issues that occur when a battery supplier fails. And it also enables us to pay less for our batteries and pack than do our competitors thus our all-electric truck is less expensive than competitive vehicles. We use the Panasonic or LG Chem 18650 cells and design the pack around these commodity cells.

 

In-House Software Development is Essential

 

Our power trains encompass the complete motor assemblies, computers, and software required for vehicle electrification. We use off-the-shelf, proven components and combine them with our proprietary software.

 

Innovation is the Future

 

We have developed a cloud-based, remote management system to manage and track the performance of all of the vehicles that we deploy in order to provide a 21st Century solution for fleet managers.

 

We are in the process of developing an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) system named HorseFly™ to work in concert with the Workhorse EGen and E100 electric powered truck products. Our unique HorseFly line of drones is designed to be the ‘last mile’ solution in delivery logistics. We worked with the University of Cincinnati to develop the HorseFly to meet the rigors of package delivery and to have eight rotors and redundant systems to ensure safety in the air. Today, we estimate that it costs approximately $1 to move a 20,000-pound diesel-powered truck one mile.  While we believe our Workhorse trucks can reduce the standard delivery costs from $1 to less than $0.30 cents per mile based on current costs of fuel, We expect that having drones handle the last leg of delivery could further potentially reduce the cost to about $.03 cents for the last mile. The all weather HorseFly battery-powered drone will carry up to 10 pounds of cargo with a 15-mile range. It is designed to meet the anticipated FAA drone guidelines expected in 2015, of which there is no guarantee, and is differentiated from other drones as it is designed to work in tandem with a Workhorse electric truck. HorseFly will deliver packages, loaded on-route by the truck's driver, to remote locations while the driver continues on the main delivery route. HorseFly will then rejoin the truck at its new location after its delivery is completed, saving the fleet operator much of the time and fuel cost of the last, most expensive, mile. Also while the HorseFly is atop the Workhorse truck, it can quickly charge its batteries from the truck's large battery pack.  We believe this implementation is superior to the proposed deployment of other delivery drones wherein the package is loaded at a distant warehouse and the drone must make a round trip flight to the delivery address and back to the warehouse.  Other applications for the HorseFly include transmission line inspections and agricultural surveys.

 

Locations and Facilities

 

The following table sets forth the location, approximate size and primary use of our principal owned, leased and licensed facilities:

 

Location  Approximate
Size
(Building)
in
Square Feet
   Primary Use  Owned,
Leased or
Licensed
   Lease/
License
Expiration
Date (if
applicable)
 
Loveland, Ohio   30,000   Administration, research and development and manufacturing   Leased    September 2018 
Union City, Indiana   270,000   Manufacturing   N/A    N/A 

 

35
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Our company headquarters and R & D facility is located at 100 Commerce Drive, Loveland, Ohio, a Cincinnati suburb. We occupy a 30,000 sq. ft. facility that allows for the manufacture of a limited number of drive trains and chassis per year. Until full production is begun in Union City, Drive trains will be delivered to the Workhorse facility in Indiana or shipped to our dealer network for onsite installation in conversion vehicles.

 

http:||content.edgar-online.com|edgar_conv_img|2014|04|15|0001013762-14-000406_GRAPH2.JPG

 

Workhorse/AMP Trucks, Inc. Location

 

Our truck assembly facility is located in Union City, Indiana.  This facility consists of three buildings with 270,000 square feet of manufacturing and office space on 46 acres.

  

Workhorse Facility

 

In March of 2013, we purchased the former Workhorse Custom Chassis assembly plant in Union City, Indiana. With this acquisition, we became an Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) of Class 3-6 commercial-grade, medium-duty truck chassis to be marketed under the well-respected Workhorse® brand.

 

Ownership and operation of this plant enables us to build new chassis with gross vehicle weight capacity of between 10,000 and 26,000 pounds and offer them in four different fuel variants—electric, gas, propane, and CNG. We plan to offer well- known Workhorse chassis like the W22 and the new, 88” track W88 truck chassis that will be offered to fleet purchasing managers at price points that we believe are both attractive and cost competitive.

  http:||content.edgar-online.com|edgar_conv_img|2014|04|15|0001013762-14-000406_GRAPH3.JPG

 

At the same time, AMP intends to partner with engine suppliers and body fabricators to offer fleet-specific, custom, purpose-built chassis that provide total cost of ownership solutions that are superior to the competition.

 

In addition to building our own chassis, we design and produce battery-electric drive trains that can be installed in new Workhorse chassis or installed as repower packages to convert used Class 3-6 medium-duty vehicles to electric power from diesel or gasoline power to electric power. Our approach is to provide battery-electric power trains utilizes proven, automotive-grade, mass-produced parts in its architecture coupled with in-house control software that it has developed over the last five years.

  

36
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

The Workhorse Custom Chassis acquisition includes other important assets including the Workhorse brand and logo, intellectual property, schematics, logistical support from UpTime Parts (a Navistar subsidiary) and, perhaps most importantly, a network of 400 plus sales and service outlets across North America.  We believe the combination of AMP’s chassis assembly capability, coupled with its ability to offer an array of fuel choices, gives AMP/Workhorse a unique opportunity in the marketplace.

 

Manufacturing

 

Vehicle assembly

 

We currently assemble our vehicles at the combination of our research and development facility located in Loveland, Ohio and our inspection facility located in Union City, IN. These combined facilities have the capacity to produce 250 vehicles per year. We intend to start utilizing our production facility in Union City, IN starting in late 2015. The facility has capacity to produce 60,000 units per year. This maximum capacity is based on running two (10) hour shifts four days per week. We believe we have access to a skilled production workforce that is available and ready to restart the facility in a short period of time. The production facility is capable of being run at an annual production rate of 500 units with a breakeven rate of 2,000 units per year.

 

Supply chain

 

Our production operations depend on obtaining systems, components, raw materials, parts, manufacturing equipment and other supplies and services from reliable suppliers in adequate quality and quantity in a timely manner. Our current supply chain is primarily located in North America, with approximately 90% of our suppliers located in North America, 5% located in Europe and 5% located in the Asia.

 

We have secured supply agreements for our critical components including our batteries. However, these are dependent on volume to ensure that they are available at a competitive price. We obtain components and raw materials from multiple sources whenever possible, similar to other vehicle manufacturers, however, certain of our primary vehicle systems and the components and raw materials used in our vehicles are purchased by us from a single source.

 

We also are subject to fluctuations in the prices of the components and raw materials we use in our business as a result of our practice of purchasing systems, components and raw materials through purchase orders. Prices for the systems, components and raw materials we use in our business fluctuate depending on market conditions and global demand. We believe that we have adequate supplies or sources of availability of the systems, components and raw materials necessary to meet our production and supply requirements.

 

Quality control

 

Our quality control efforts are divided between product quality and supplier quality, both of which are focused on designing and producing products and processes with high levels of reliability. We have a dedicated quality control employees that work with our engineering team and our suppliers to ensure that the product designs meet functional specifications and durability requirements. Our quality control employees also work with our suppliers to ensure that their processes and systems are capable of delivering the parts and components we need at the required quality level, on time, and on budget. We utilize a Post Delivery Inspection system and historically the facility in Union City has operated with an ISO 9001 certification.

 

Warranty policies

 

We sell our vehicles with standard component-based warranties under which each vehicle component is covered for a specific period of time. The chassis, generator motor, and related components are warranted for three years or 36,000 miles while the electrification package is covered for three years or 60,000 miles. Finally, the battery pack is covered for eight years or 100,000 miles, whichever comes first, subject to certain exclusions and exceptions.

 

Marketing

 

Our sales team is focused on a targeted list of high profile, former purchasers, and current buyers of the Workhorse chassis with the goal of securing purchase orders from these companies. Our priority is to establish the commercial step van as our core business. Our goal is to be the best choice for a vehicle in this segment regardless of the fuel type that the customer chooses.  Additionally, our sales plan is to meet with the top potential customers and obtain purchase orders for new electric, extended range electric, gasoline, propane, or CNG vehicles for their production vehicle requirements.

 

The second segment that we are focused on is medium-duty buses. This is based on fact that we completed two 15-passenger para-transit buses for BARTA (Berks County Regional Transit Authority) in Pennsylvania.  These buses are equipped with wireless charging and represent a unique solution for a number of applications (i.e. airport hotels, rental car companies and municipal transit authorities). Once we have completed all of the relevant testing on these buses we will work with bus body builders to develop pricing and plan to offer a Workhorse/AMP chassis for sales in late 2016.

 

37
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Finally, since our competitive advantage in the marketplace is our ability to provide purpose-built solutions to customers that have unique requirements at relatively low-volume, we have submitted multiple proposals to companies for purpose-built vehicle applications.

 

AMP Trucks will promote the Workhorse brand at select trade shows, conferences and briefings.

 

Strategic Relationships

 

Power Solutions International: PSI supplies engines that are certified and calibrated for on-road use by companies such as AMP/Workhorse utilizing gasoline, propane or CNG as a fuel.  They have the ability and the resources to provide engines that meet fleet requirements in volumes that are significantly below the volume requirements of companies like Ford or Freightliner for similar specialized powertrain systems.

 

Morgan Olsen, Utilimaster, TransTech Bus, ECO, and other up-fitters or body fabricators : All of these companies build bodies customized for the needs of their customers and mated to chassis that are available to them from the short list of chassis suppliers. The functionality and configuration the end-user receives in the finished product is limited by the available chassis/powertrain.  AMP/Workhorse will work with these organizations to provide chassis that not only best fit the needs of the end user customer but also provide the customer with a competitive advantage in their specific industry or application.

 

Research and Development

 

The majority of our research and development is conducted in-house at our facilities near Cincinnati, Ohio.  Additionally, we contract with engineering firms as well as the University of Cincinnati to assist with validation and certification requirements as well as specific vehicle integration tasks.

 

Competitive Companies

 

The medium-duty commercial vehicle market is highly competitive and we expect it to become even more so in the future as additional companies launch competing vehicle offerings. The medium-duty commercial alternatively fueled vehicle market, however, is less developed and competitive. There are two primary competitors in the medium-duty vehicle segment in the US market:  Ford and Freightliner.  Neither has disclosed any plans to offer 100% EV or EREV vehicles in this segment. Ford is vertically integrated building a complete vehicle or chassis including Ford engine and transmission.  They provide a chassis as a strip-chassis (which is similar to the Workhorse product) or they provide it with a cab. Freightliner provides a chassis as a strip-chassis, which is similar to the Workhorse/AMP Truck chassis.

 

We believe the most dramatic difference between AMP and the other competitors in the medium duty truck market is our ability to offer customers purpose-built solutions that meet the needs of their unique requirements at a competitive price. While there are many electric car companies from abroad, there are only a few foreign companies that have vehicles in the category of medium-duty trucks.

 

We believe that the primary competitive factors within the medium-duty commercial vehicle market are:

 

the difference in the initial purchase prices of electric vehicles and comparable vehicles powered by internal combustion engines, both including and excluding the impact of government and other subsidies and incentives designed to promote the purchase of electric vehicles;
  
the total cost of vehicle ownership over the vehicle's expected life, which includes the initial purchase price and ongoing operational and maintenance costs;
  
vehicle quality, performance and safety;
  
government regulations and economic incentives promoting fuel efficiency and alternate forms of energy;
  
the quality and availability of service for the vehicle, including the availability of replacement parts; and
  
for electric vehicles, the range over which they may be driven on a single battery charge.

 

GOVERNMENT REGULATION

 

Our electric vehicles are designed to comply with a significant number of governmental regulations and industry standards, some of which are evolving as new technologies are deployed. Government regulations regarding the manufacture, sale and implementation of products and systems similar to our electric vehicles are subject to future change. We cannot predict what impact, if any, such changes may have upon our business. We believe that our vehicles are in conformity with all applicable laws in all relevant jurisdictions.

 

38
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Emission and fuel economy standards

 

Government regulation related to climate change is under consideration at the U.S. federal and state levels. The EPA and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, or NHTSA, issued a final rule for greenhouse gas emissions and fuel economy requirements for trucks and heavy-duty engines on August 9, 2011, which will have an initial phase in starting with model year 2014 and a final phase in occurring in model year 2017. NHTSA standards for model year 2014 and 2015 will be voluntary, while mandatory standards will first come into effect in 2016.

 

The rule provides emission standards for CO2 and fuel consumption standards for three main categories of vehicles: (i) combination tractors, (ii) heavy-duty pickup trucks and vans and (iii) vocational vehicles. We believe that the Workhorse chassis would be considered “vocational vehicles" under the rule. According to the EPA and NHTSA, vocational vehicles consist of a wide variety of truck and bus types, including delivery, refuse, utility, dump, cement, transit bus, shuttle bus, school bus, emergency vehicles, motor homes and tow trucks, and are characterized by a complex build process, with an incomplete chassis often built with an engine and transmission purchased from other manufacturers, then sold to a body manufacturer.

 

The EPA and NHTSA rule also establishes multiple flexibility and incentive programs for manufacturers of alternatively fueled vehicles, such as the Workhorse E-100 full electric and the E-Gen Electric, including an engine averaging, banking and trading, or ABT, program, a vehicle ABT program and additional credit programs for early adoption of standards or deployment of advanced or innovative technologies. The ABT programs will allow for emission and/or fuel consumption credits to be averaged, banked or traded within defined groupings of the regulatory subcategories. The additional credit programs will allow manufacturers of engines and vehicles to be eligible to generate credits if they demonstrate improvements in excess of the standards established in the rule prior to the model year the standards become effective or if they introduce advanced or innovative technology engines or vehicles.

 

The Clean Air Act requires that we obtain a Certificate of Conformity issued by the EPA and a California Executive Order issued by CARB with respect to emissions for our vehicles. The Certificate of Conformity is required for vehicles sold in states covered by the Clean Air Act's standards and the Executive Order is required for vehicles sold in states that have sought and received a waiver from the EPA to utilize California standards. The California standards for emissions control for certain regulated pollutants for new vehicles and engines sold in California are set by CARB. States that have adopted the California standards as approved by EPA also recognize the Executive Order for sales of vehicles.

 

Manufacturers who sell vehicles in states covered by federal requirements under the Clean Air Act without a Certificate of Conformity may be subject to penalties of up to $37,500 per violation and be required to recall and remedy any vehicles sold with emissions in excess of Clean Air Act standards. In 2013, we received approval from CARB to sell the E-100 in California based on our own emissions tests.

 

Vehicle safety and testing

 

The National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966, or the Safety Act, regulates motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment in the United States in two primary ways. First, the Safety Act prohibits the sale in the United States of any new vehicle or equipment that does not conform to applicable motor vehicle safety standards established by NHTSA. Meeting or exceeding many safety standards is costly, in part because the standards tend to conflict with the need to reduce vehicle weight in order to meet emissions and fuel economy standards. Second, the Safety Act requires that defects related to motor vehicle safety be remedied through safety recall campaigns. A manufacturer is obligated to recall vehicles if it determines that the vehicles do not comply with a safety standard. Should we or NHTSA determine that either a safety defect or noncompliance exists with respect to any of our vehicles, the cost of such recall campaigns could be substantial.

 

Battery safety and testing

 

Our battery packs conform to mandatory regulations that govern transport of "dangerous goods," which includes lithium-ion batteries, that may present a risk in transportation. The governing regulations, which are issued by PHMSA, are based on the UN Recommendations on the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods Model Regulations, and related UN Manual of Tests and Criteria. The requirements for shipments of these goods vary by mode of transportation, such as ocean vessel, rail, truck and air.

 

Our battery module suppliers have completed the applicable transportation tests for our prototype and production battery packs demonstrating our compliance with the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria, including:

 

altitude simulation, which involves simulating air transport;
  
thermal cycling, which involves assessing cell and battery seal integrity;
  
vibration, which involves simulating vibration during transport;
  
shock, which involves simulating possible impacts during transport;

 

39
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

external short circuit, which involves simulating an external short circuit; and
  
overcharge, which involves evaluating the ability of a rechargeable battery to withstand overcharging.

 

Vehicle dealer and distribution regulation

 

Certain states' laws require motor vehicle manufacturers and dealers to be licensed in such states in order to conduct manufacturing and sales activities. To date, we are registered as both a motor vehicle manufacturer and dealer in Indiana and Ohio as well as a dealer in California and Chicago. We have not yet sought formal clarification of our ability to manufacture or sell our vehicles in any other states.

 

Intellectual Property

 

We has five pending trademark applications and two issued trademark registrations in the U.S. with intent to pursue foreign trademark registration as well. We have one pending U.S. patent application, six existing patents and also plan to pursue appropriate foreign patent protection on those inventions. The following is a summary of our patents:

 

Country Status Serial Number Application Date Patent Number Issue/Grant Date Title Expiration Date
Canada Granted 2523653 10/17/2005 2523653 12/22/2009 VEHICLE CHASSIS ASSEMBLY 10/17/2025
United States Granted 11/252,220 10/17/2005 7,717,464 05/18/2010 Vehicle Chassis Assembly 09/06/2026
United States Granted 11/252,219 10/17/2005 7,559,578 07/14/2009 Vehicle Chassis Assembly 09/06/2026
United States Granted 29/243,074 11/18/2005 D561,078 02/05/2008 Vehicle Header 02/05/2022
United States Granted 29/243,129 11/18/2005 D561,079 02/05/2008 Vehicle Header 02/05/2022
United States Granted 13/283,663 10/28/2011 8,541,915 09/24/2013

DRIVE MODULE AND MANIFOLD FOR ELECTRIC MOTOR DRIVE ASSEMBLY

12/16/2031
United States Filed 61/933,350 01/30/2014 NA NA ONBOARD GENERATOR DRIVE SYSTEM FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES THAT SHARE AN ELECTRIC MOTOR FOR BOTH PROPULSION AND GENERATION 01/30/2015

 

Agreements

 

Momentum Dynamics and BARTA (Berks County Regional Transportation Authority)

On December 29, 2012, the Company entered into an Agreement with Momentum Dynamics to engineer, develop, and produce two development vehicles for BARTA in Reading, Pennsylvania.  We are seeking to have this project generate the following: promote the use of AMP products for other similar applications i.e. rental car shuttle buses, motel and hotel shuttle buses, school   buses, and other hospitality shuttle bus applications, network the AMP products through the Momentum Dynamic sales channel, and promote the sale of AMP products to the Departments of Transportation throughout the US.

 

Navistar International Truck

In April of 2012 we signed a development agreement with Navistar International Truck.  The scope of work for this project was to repower two 2004 vintage W1652 vehicles, which were originally produced by Navistar.  Their customer, a large package delivery company, has an interest in repowering these vehicles with something other than the current diesel engine that is in this vehicle.  Navistar was interested in working with them to repower these vehicles with either electric or some other fuel system.  With electric being the most desirable if the customer’s price point could be met, AMP was subcontracted by Navistar to perform the electric repower, and in August of 2012 AMP delivered the first vehicle to Navistar.  The vehicle passed their initial performance requirements which were based on their end customer’s specifications.  In October 2012 Navistar turned the project over to AMP to work directly with them to provide a 100% electric repowered vehicle.  

 

40
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

AMP has entered into a purchase agreement with this customer to supply 18 all-electric Workhorse E-100 Walk In Vans to be deployed in the Houston-Galveston, Texas area. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) selected this project to improve local air quality in the Houston-Galveston area, which is currently designated as a National Ambient Air Quality Non-Attainment Area. The major transportation company has also entered into a purchase agreement to purchase two E-GEN 100 vehicles to be delivering in the first quarter of 2015.

 

Employees

 

We currently have 13 full-time and two part-time employees located in Loveland, Ohio and two full-time and one part-time employees located in Union City, Indiana. We also contract for hire with approximately 17 outside consultants and contractors. Three of our employees are engaged in administrative aspects of our business and 15 are involved in research and development. Ten of our contractors are involved in research and development and seven are involved in administration.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

We are not currently a party to any pending or threatened legal proceeding or government investigations.

  

41
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

MANAGEMENT

 

Executive Officers and Directors

 

Set forth below is a list of the names, ages as of November 20, 2014 and positions, and a brief account of the business experience of the individuals who serve as our executive officers and directors as of the date of this prospectus.

 

Name  Age  Position
James E. Taylor  58  Chairman of the Board of Directors
       
Stephen S. Burns  55  Director, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
       
Martin J. Rucidlo  55  President
       
Julio C. Rodriguez  56  Chief Financial Officer
       
Raymond J. Chess  57  Director

  

Our officers and directors are elected annually for a one year term or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal.

  

The following is a brief summary of the background of each of our directors and executive officers, including specific information about each director’s experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led the Board of Directors to the conclusion that the individual is qualified to serve on our Board of Directors.

 

James E. Taylor, Chairman of the Board of Directors

 

Mr. Taylor has three decades of automotive experience in three countries.  His last GM assignment, he served as CEO of Hummer from August 2008 to February 2010 during the attempted divesture.  Prior to that, he was President of Cadillac from 2005 to 2008, responsible for the product planning, marketing, promotional and sales activities that significantly contributed to Cadillac’s global renaissance.  Prior to that, Mr. Taylor was a vehicle line executive for Cadillac from 1995 to 2005, directing the planning, engineering and manufacturing of the award-winning ground up Cadillac CTS, SRX and the STS models, which contributed significantly to the resurgence of Cadillac.  Mr. Taylor holds a Bachelors of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering & Management from McMaster University, Ontario, Canada. Mr. Taylor currently serves as EVP for Manufacturing and Purchasing for Fisker Automotive and Technologies, LLC. We believe Mr. Taylor’s training as an engineer, his knowledge and experience with respect to the automobile industry qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors.

 

Stephen S. Burns, Director, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Secretary

 

Mr. Burns, a Co-Founder of our company, has served as our CEO since inception.  Mr. Burns was appointed as CEO, CFO, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company on December 28, 2009.  Mr. Burns had founded several companies, most recently iTookThisOnMyPhone.com, a mobile photo and video-sharing technology company, MobileVoiceControl, Inc. a developer of high-end speech recognition software for smartphones sold to Nuance Communications (NASDAQ:NUAN), Inc. In 2006, AskMeNow [OTC:AKMN] a mobile search and information delivery system sold to Ocean West Holdings in 2005, PocketScript, the leading mobile electronic prescription system in the world which was sold to ZixCorp [NASDAQ:ZIXI] in 2002, Over The Line/AdLink, sold to Gannett Co. Inc. (NYSE:GCI) in 1994 and the design and development of Suspension Parameter Measurement Machines. We believe Mr. Burns' entrepreneurial background as well as his management and leadership pedigree qualify him to serve on the Board of Directors.

 

Martin J. Rucidlo, President

 

Mr. Rucidlo has serves as our President since August 2012 and as the Director of Sales for AMP Electric Vehicles Inc. from 2010. Mr. Rucidlo has over 30 years of experience in a variety of industries ranging from VP Sales & Marketing to General Manager positions in the aerospace, packaging, software, medical technology, and automotive industries.  He has held executive-level positions at Zix Corporation, Quest Diagnostics Inc., Nuance Communications., PCC Airfoils and Alcoa. Prior to joining AMP, Mr. Rucidlo served as the Director of Technology Sales at Quest Diagnostics from March 2009 to May 2010, Director of NVC Healthcare Sales at Nuance Communications from August 2006 to March 2009, VP Sales Care Delivery Solutions Zix Corporation from February 2001 to January 2005 and VP Sales and Marketing of WS Packaging from November 1996 to February 2001.  He holds a Bachelors of Science Degree in Industrial Engineering from The Pennsylvania State University.

 

42
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Julio C. Rodriguez, Chief Financial Officer

 

Mr. Rodriguez has serves as our President since August 2013. Mr. Rodriguez is a finance executive with over 30 years of experience in financial and operational leadership roles within various industries including the automotive industry.  From 1999 until 2013, Mr. Rodriguez served in various executive roles for Genuine Parts Company ("GPC") and its subsidiaries.  Most recently, from 2008 through 2013, Mr. Rodriguez served as Director Process Improvement for GPC, whereby Mr. Rodriguez organized, coordinated, executed control process improvement and cost savings projects for all company divisions. Prior to this, from 2006 through 2008, Mr. Rodriguez served as Vice President Finance & Corporate Secretary for Johnson Industries, a subsidiary of GPC.    Mr. Rodriguez holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration and a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from Catholic University Caracas, Venezuela.

 

Raymond J. Chess, Director

 

Mr. Chess was appointed as a director of our company in October 2013. Mr. Chess served as a Global Vehicle Line Executive for General Motors Co. (“GM”), where he was responsible for global, cross functional general management of the GM crossover market segment from May 2009 through December 2012.  Prior to this, from August 2001 until April 2009, Mr. Chess was responsible for GM’s commercial truck segment.  Previous GM assignments included leadership roles in the full size truck segment, metal fabrication and body assembly.  Mr. Chess's background includes broad, hands-on manufacturing leadership roles with manufacturing, engineering and manufacturing floor operations. Mr. Chess holds a Bachelors of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from Kettering University and an MBA from Indiana University. We believe Mr. Chess’s training as an engineer and his knowledge and experience with respect to the automobile industry qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors.

 

Other Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

 

None of our directors or executive officers has been involved in any bankruptcy or criminal proceedings, nor have there been any judgments or injunctions brought against any of our directors or executive officers during the last ten years that we consider material to the evaluation of the ability and integrity of any director or executive officer.

 

Board of Directors Composition and Election of Directors

 

Our Board of Directors currently consists of three directors.

 

Our board of directors will consist of                          members upon the closing of this offering.

 

All directors hold office until their successors have been elected and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal. At each annual meeting of stockholders, the successors to directors whose terms will then expire will serve from the time of election and qualification until the annual meeting following election and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. A resolution of the board of directors may change the authorized number of directors, and the affirmative vote of our board of directors may amend the provision of our bylaws establishing the number of directors.

 

Director Independence

 

Under the listing requirements and rules of the NASDAQ Capital Market, independent directors must comprise a majority of our board of directors as a listed company within one year of the closing of this offering.

 

Board Committees

 

Prior to the effectiveness of this offering, our board of directors will establish an audit committee, a compensation committee, and a nominating and corporate governance committee, each of which will operate, upon the completion of this offering, under a charter that has been approved by our board of directors. The composition of each committee will be effective upon the completion of this offering. Each committee will have a written charter prior to the effectiveness of this offering.

 

Prior to the effectiveness of this offering, our board of directors will make a determination of the independence of the members of the audit committee, the compensation committee and the nominating and corporate governance committee under The NASDAQ Marketplace Rules, as applicable, including, in the case of all of the members of our audit committee, the independence requirements contemplated by Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In making such determination, the board of directors will consider the relationships that each director has with our company and all other facts and circumstances that the board of directors deemed relevant in determining director independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each director.

 

43
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Audit Committee.   Upon the completion of this offering, our audit committee will be comprised of Mr.                          and Mr.                         . Our board of directors has determined that                          is an audit committee financial expert, as defined by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and satisfies the financial sophistication requirements of applicable NASDAQ rules.

 

Our audit committee will be authorized to:

 

    approve and retain the independent auditors to conduct the annual audit of our financial statements;

 

    review the proposed scope and results of the audit;

 

    review and pre-approve audit and non-audit fees and services;

 

    review accounting and financial controls with the independent auditors and our financial and accounting staff;

 

    review and approve transactions between us and our directors, officers and affiliates;

 

    recognize and prevent prohibited non-audit services;

 

    establish procedures for complaints received by us regarding accounting matters;

 

    oversee internal audit functions, if any; and

 

    prepare the report of the audit committee that the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission require to be included in our annual meeting proxy statement.

 

Compensation Committee.   Upon completion of this offering, our compensation committee will be comprised of         , and         . None of the members of our compensation committee at any time has been one of our officers or employees.

 

Our compensation committee will be authorized to:

 

    review and recommend the compensation arrangements for management, including the compensation for our president and chief executive officer;

 

    establish and review general compensation policies with the objective to attract and retain superior talent, to reward individual performance and to achieve our financial goals;

 

    administer our stock incentive plans; and

 

    prepare the report of the compensation committee that the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission require to be included in our annual meeting proxy statement,

 

Nominating and Governance Committee .   Upon completion of this offering, our nominating and governance committee will be comprised of         , and             .

 

Our nominating and governance committee will be authorized to:

 

    identify and nominate members of the board of directors;

 

    develop and recommend to the board of directors a set of corporate governance principles applicable to our company; and

 

    oversee the evaluation of our board of directors.

 

Insider Participation and Other Relationships

 

Stephen S. Burns, our Chief Executive Officer, is also a member of our board of directors. Stephen S. Burns and , two of our directors, are also significant shareholders, each having a beneficial ownership of % and % respectively of our outstanding common stock equivalents immediately before this offering.

 

There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

 

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

 

We have implemented a corporate code of ethics. The Code of Ethics is available on our website at www.ampelectricvehicles.com. We expect that any amendments to the code, or any waivers of its requirements, will be disclosed on our website.

  

44
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Market for Our Shares of Common Stock

 

Market Information

 

Our common stock was quoted on the OTCBB and OTCQB under the symbol "TTSO" from July 14, 2009 through May 24, 2010 and then under the symbol “AMPD” from May 24, 2010 to present.  The following table sets forth the range of high and low prices per share of our common stock for each period indicated.

 

Quarter Ended  March 31   June 30   September 30   December 31
   High   Low   High   Low   High   Low   High   Low
2012  $0.55   $0.20   $0.29   $0.11   $0.25   $0.10   $0.25   $0.08
2013   0.37    0.12    0.53    0.23    0.51    0.23    0.30    0.10
2014*   0.17    0.10   $0.14   $0.10   $0.14   $0.08   $0.34   $0.12

 

* The fourth quarter 2014 market information is as of December 10, 2014

 

Holders of our Common Stock

 

As of November 20, 2014, there were approximately 94 stockholders of record of our common stock.  This number does not include shares held by brokerage clearing houses, depositories or others in unregistered form.  The stock transfer agent for our securities is Empire Stock Transfer, Inc., 1859 Whitney Mesa Drive, Henderson, Nevada 89014.

 

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

 

The following table sets forth the aggregate information of our equity compensation plans in effect as of December 31, 2013:

 

Plan  Number of
securities to
be issued
upon
exercise of
outstanding
options and
rights
   Weighted-
average
exercise
price of
outstanding
options and
rights
   Number of
securities
remaining
available
for future
issuance
under
equity
compensation
plans
(excluding
securities
reflected in
first
column)
 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders – 2010 Stock Incentive Plan   1,582,000   $0.42    388,250 
                
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders – 2011 Incentive Stock Plan   225,000   $0.70    775,000 
                
Equity compensation plans or arrangements not approved by security holders - 2012 Incentive Stock Plan   21,753,565   $0.77    1,441,500 
                
Equity compensation plans or arrangements not approved by security holders - 2013 Incentive Stock Plan   5,000,000   $0.28    2,500,000 
                
Total   23,560,565   $0.75    5,104,750 

 

45
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

The following summary compensation table sets out details of compensation paid to (a) our principal executive officer; (b) each of our two most highly compensated executive officers who served as executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013; and (c) up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided under (b) but for the fact that the individual was not serving as our executive officer at the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, except that no disclosure is provided for any named executive officer, other than our principal executive officer, whose total compensation did not exceed $100,000 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013:

 

Summary Compensation Table

Name and
Principal Position
  Year   Salary
($)
   Bonus
($)
   Stock Awards
($)
   Option
Awards
($)
   Non-
equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
   Change in
Pension Value
and Non-
Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)
   All Other
Compensation
($)
   Total ($) 
James E. Taylor Chairman of the Board (1)   2013    -    -    -    -    -    -    80,000    80,000 
    2012    125,000    -    -    -    -    -    -    125,000 
                                              
Stephen S. Burns CEO and Director   2013    200,000    -    -    11,160    -    -    -    211,160 
    2012    200,000    -    -    11,160    -    -    -    211,160 
                                              
Martin J. Rucidlo President   2013    125,000    -    -    30,600    -    -    -    155,600 
    2012    108,333    -    -    30,600    -    -    -    138,933 
                                              
Richard J. Calme Director of Finance   2013    75,000    -    -    3,720    -    -    -    78,720 
    2012    75,000    -    -    3,720    -    -    -    78,720 
                                              
Paul V. Gonzales CFO (2)   2013    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    - 
    2012    56,250    -    -    -    -    -    -    56,250 
                                              
Julio C. Rodriguez CFO   2013    150,000    -    -    45,000    -    -    -    195,000 

 

(1) Resigned as CEO effective August 10, 2012

(2) Resigned as CFO effective May 16, 2012

  

Employment Agreements

 

James E. Taylor Employment Agreement

 

On December 8, 2010, we entered into an employment agreement with James E. Taylor pursuant to which he was appointed as the Chief Executive Officer and Vice-Chairman of the Company in consideration of an annual salary of $300,000.  Additionally, Mr. Taylor was eligible for annual bonuses with a target amount of 100% of his salary.   As additional compensation, we granted Mr. Taylor options to acquire 1,200,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.72 per share for a period of ten years. We also provided Mr. Taylor with a common stock purchase warrant to acquire 600,000 shares of common stock exercisable at any time in the five years following the signing of the agreement at an exercise price of $2.00 per share.  Effective August 10, 2012, Mr. Taylor resigned as the CEO and continues to serve as the Chairman of the Board of Directors.  As of December 31, 2013, payroll in the amount of $87,500 was due and payable and included in accounts payable, based on terms of Mr. Taylor’s employment agreement.

 

Stephen S. Burns Employment Agreement

 

On December 8, 2010, we entered into an employment agreement with Stephen S. Burns pursuant to which he was appointed as the President of the Company in consideration of an annual salary of $200,000.  Additionally, Mr. Burns will be eligible for annual bonuses with a target amount of 100% of his salary. On December 14, 2014, we agreed to increase Mr. Burns’ salary to $275,000 per annum and agreed to pay a bonus of $50,000 with $25,000 payable upon delivering the two Workhorse EGEN and $25,000 payable upon delivering the 18 Workhorse 100 electric trucks.   The actual amount of any bonus may be more or less than such target and will be determined by the Board in its absolute discretion.  Half of the bonus may be paid, in the Company’s discretion, in unregistered shares of common stock at a price per share equal to the weighted average closing price per share of the common stock over the twenty most recent trading days prior to such grant.  In addition to the salary and any bonus, Mr. Burns will be entitled to receive health and fringe benefits that are generally available to the Company’s management employees in accordance with the then existing terms and conditions of the Company’s policies.  As additional compensation, we granted Mr. Burns options to acquire 300,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.72 per share for a period of ten years.  We also provided Mr. Burns with a common stock purchase warrant to acquire 300,000 shares of Common Stock exercisable at any time in the five years following the signing of the agreement at an exercise price of $2.00 per share.  

  

Martin J. Rucidlo Employment Agreement

 

On August 24, 2012, Martin J. Rucidlo was engaged to serve as the President of our company.   On August 24, 2012, Mr. Rucidlo entered into a letter agreement with our company pursuant to which he was appointed as the President of the Company in consideration of an annual salary of $125,000.  As additional compensation, we granted Mr. Rucidlo options to purchase 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.21 per share.  The options will expire three years from the vesting period with 90,000 options vesting upon the signing of the Agreement and 105,000 options vesting each of the following two years on the anniversary date of the Agreement for a total of 300,000 shares.

46
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Julio C. Rodriguez Employment Agreement

 

On August 15, 2013, we entered into an employment agreement with Julio C. Rodriguez pursuant to which Mr. Rodriguez agreed to serve as the Chief Financial Officer of our company.  The Agreement has an effective date of August 7, 2013.  Mr. Rodriguez will replace Richard J. Calme who resigned as the Interim Chief Financial Officer.  Mr. Calme has been appointed to serve as Director of Finance.  Pursuant to the terms of the Employment Agreement, Mr. Rodriguez shall receive an annual salary of $150,000.  In addition to the salary, Mr. Rodriguez will be entitled to receive health and fringe benefits that are generally available to our management employees.  As additional compensation, we granted Mr. Rodriguez options to acquire 300,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.40 per share for a period of two years.

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

 

The following table sets forth information with respect to the outstanding equity awards of our principal executive officers and principal financial officer during 2012, and each person who served as an executive officer of our company as of December 31, 2013:

 

   Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
   Option awards  Stock awards
Name and principal position  Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) Exercisable   Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) Unexercisable   Equity incentive plan awards: Number of securities underlying unexercised options
(#)
   Options exercise price
($)
   Option expiration Date  Number of shares or units of stock that have not vested
(#)
   Market value of shares or units of stock that have not vested
($)
   Equity incentive plan awards: Number of unearned shares other rights that have not vested
(#)
   Equity incentive plan awards: Market or payout value of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested
($)
James E, Taylor   325,000    0    0   $0.68   10/11/2015   0   $0    0   $0
Chairman of the   1,200,000    0    0   $0.72   12/8/2020   0   $0    0   $0
Board (1)   600,000    0    0   $2.00   12/8/2015   0   $0    0   $0
    375,000    125,000(a)   0   $0.60   5/25/2016   0   $0    0   $0
    500,000    0    0   $2.00   5/25/2016   0   $0    0   $0
    100,000    200,000(b)   0   $0.15   8/10/2017   0   $0    0   $0
                                           
Stephen S. Burns   600,000    0    0   $0.40   5/12/2015   0   $0    0   $0
CEO and Director   300,000    0    0   $0.72   12/8/2020   0   $0    0   $0
    300,000    0    0   $2.00   12/8/2015   0   $0    0   $0
    375,000    125,000(a)   0   $0.60   5/25/2016   0   $0    0   $0
    500,000    0    0   $2.00   5/25/2016   0   $0    0   $0
    100,000    0    0   $0.25   5/2/2015   0   $0    0   $0
    389,250    0    0   $0.25   6/30/2015   0   $0    0   $0
    102,000    198,000(c)   0   $0.11   12/4/2015   0   $0    0   $0
                                           
Martin J. Rucidlo   200,000    0    0   $0.40   5/12/2015   0   $0    0   $0
President   50,000    0    0   $0.70   6/30/2013   0   $0    0   $0